Instructions

Critically analyze each of the identified organizational challenges you identified in Week 3 and compare them with Capella University’s criteria for an approvable doctoral capstone topic and project and with elements needed for the application of EBP improvement. Then, make a case for focusing on one challenge as the best opportunity for EBP improvement in a potential doctoral capstone project.

Requirements

The assignment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format, length, and supporting evidence.

• Describe the characteristics of a professional doctorate and doctoral capstone project.
  • Compare professional activities and roles for individuals with a DHA or DrPH degree compared to a PhD degree.
  • Delineate the differences and similarities between a DHA or DrPH capstone project and a PhD dissertation.
  • Describe three major characteristics of a doctoral capstone project.
• Critically analyze the potential of evidence-based improvement to mitigate the negative impact of each of the three identified organizational challenges.
  • Describe the appropriateness of applying the EBP process to mitigate the negative impact of the identified challenges.
  • Summarize the quality of available research evidence to support a potential project focused on mitigating the negative impact of the identified challenges.
  • Describe how the EBP process could facilitate improvements that mitigate the negative impact of the challenges in a short period of time.
• Determine the extent to which a project focused on mitigating the negative impact of each of the three organizational challenges meets Capella University criteria for a doctoral capstone project.
  • Outline what a doctoral capstone project is and what it is not, according to Capella University criteria for a doctoral capstone project.
  • Describe how the application of existing knowledge to mitigate the negative impact of the challenges aligns with your program and specialization and contributes to your field.
  • Summarize Capella University criteria that would be met by a doctoral capstone project focused on mitigating the negative impact of the challenges.
• Argue for the potential success and approval of a doctoral capstone project focused on the evidence-based improvement of one challenge the organization is facing.
  • Describe how the evidence-based improvement of one challenge meets professional doctorate, EBP, and university standards and criteria.
• Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
• Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Additional Requirements

• Format: Format your paper using APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]. An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
  • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
  • A running head on all pages.
  • Appropriate section headings.
• Length: Your paper should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
• Supporting evidence: Cite at least two current and relevant peer-reviewed studies. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

SMART Plan: Project Goal and Objectives

Part 1

Using the data collected on your chosen public health issue and the target population it affects, develop a goal for your program planning project. After you write your initial goal, use the checklist questions to guide the development of your goal. Refine your goal as needed until all criteria are met.

If you answered “yes” to all, your goal is ready. Proceed to Part 2.

If you answered “no” to any, your goal needs refinement. Make necessary changes, apply the criteria, then proceed to Part 2.

Part 2

Use the template below to develop two process objectives that support your goal. Process objectives should:

1. Focus on the activities to be completed in a specific time period

1. Enable accountability by setting specific activities to be completed by specific dates

1. Explain what you are doing and when you will do it

Begin by stating your process objective. Provide a rationale for your stated objective. After you write your initial objective, use the SMART criteria questions in the checklist below to assess each objective to determine if it is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Adjust your objectives as needed until all the criteria are met.

If you answered “yes” to all, your process objectives are ready. Proceed to Part 3.

If you answered “no” to any, your process objectives need refinement. Make necessary changes, apply the criteria, then proceed to Part 3.

Part 3

Use the template below to develop three outcome objectives (one short-term, one intermediate, and one long-term) that support your goal. Outcome objectives should:

1. Express the intended results or accomplishments of program or intervention activities

1. Focus on changes in policy, a system, the environment, knowledge, attitudes, or behavior

1. Can be short-term, intermediate, or long-term

2. Short-term objectives are generally expected immediately and occur soon after the program or intervention is implemented; within a year

2. Intermediate objectives result from and follow short-term outcomes; 1-3 years

2. Long-term objectives state the ultimate expected impact of the program or intervention; 3-5 years

Begin by stating your outcome objectives. Provide a rationale for your stated objective. After you write your initial objective, use the SMART criteria questions in the checklist below to assess each objective to determine if it is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Adjust your objectives as needed until all the criteria are met.

If you answered “yes” to all, your outcome objectives are ready. You’re ready to submit the assignment.

If you answered “no” to any, your outcome objectives need refinement. Make necessary changes, apply the criteria, then submit your assignment.

Read the case on page 227: When Nursing Meets Medicine. Answer all four questions below:

Be concise and use outside resources if needed.

1. How is Maureen’s situation affected  by the structure of the nursing profession? Past and present?

2. How is Maureen’s situation affected by the changing roles for nurses that have occurred in the United States in the last 40 years?

3. How is Maureen’s situation affected by the changes that have occurred in the delivery of health care over the last 10-20 years?

4. What changes do you think are needed in the health care system to prevent the types of mistakes illustrated in this case?

Your report should be no less than two pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12 font. (500 words). Use supporting sources as necessary. Make sure to use proper in text citations.

Power Point

Topic- Healthcare Accessibility in the Inuit Culture of Alaska and Northern Canada

Outlines for slides

Health- Morbidity and Mortality

Facing Disparity- Areas of Disparity

Telehealth- What is Telehealth? Demonstrated success of Public health

P.S( Note sections at the bottom of slides have to be 250 -350 words)