leadership theories

leadership theories

The assignment focuses on identifying your leadership self-assessment, please access the MindTools website (https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/leadership-style-quiz.htm) to complete your self-assessment. Once you complete the test and your total is calculated please answer the following five questions with at least 350 words.

Questions:
1. Discuss the pros and cons of using Leadership Style based on the results provided by MindTools website? Please explain whether you agree or disagree with the results?
2. Share your opinion on the benefits of strategic leadership when working with teams?
3. How will you work on your leadership areas of improvement? Please discuss three to four leadership plans you will implement in future based on the lessons learned in this course.
4. What advice would you give to leaders who are struggling during their career start? How will you communicate and motivate people who have poor work experience?
The content taken from textbook, or any other source should be paraphrased (written in own words). Write in complete sentences and use good grammar, double-spacing, 12 point font, with one-inch margins. Be sure to cite five resources and use APA format for the entire assignment.Pros & Cons of 12 Leadership Styles for Successful Leaders (complete list) – https://brand-minds.medium.com/pros-cons-of-12-leadership-styles-for-successful-leaders-complete-list-c9bd0c38e531

8 Different Leadership Styles (and Their Pros and Cons) – https://www.themuse.com/advice/common-leadership-styles-with-pros-and-cons

Institution of Slavery in America

Institution of Slavery in America

Students will submit a 3-5 page research paper which addresses the research question
provided below. All papers should adhere to the Chicago Manual of Style “Notes & Bibliography”
format for citations, and they should be written in 12-point Times New Roman font, double
spaced. A minimum of 3 sources should be used and cited, and may include primary source
material, academic books and articles, or online academic sources. Your course textbook,  Give  Give
Me Liberty! by Eric Foner should be used By Eric Foner, can and should be used as one of your sources. It will be      \
Friday, May 5th by 11:59 PM. It will be submitted via Canvas, and it will be run through
anti-plagiarism software.
This essay is intended to introduce students to academic writing in the discipline of history, and
it is not intended to be an exhaustive research endeavor. Students will be given a clear essay
prompt with specific research questions and objectives that can be addressed in 5 pages or
less.Research Question
The issue of slavery was a divisive factor in American society even before the colonies gained
independence from Great Britain. As early as the 17th century the institution of slavery was a
topic of debate amongst colonial leaders, and by the founding of the United States in 1776, the
issue of whether or not the practice should continue in the new nation had divided the
leadership. However, the South’s dependence on slave labor led to a series of compromises
that allowed the continuation and westward expansion of slavery throughout the early 1800s. By
1860, the nation was so divided over the issue that Southern states chose to leave the Union in
order to preserve their right to uphold the institution of slavery. In your essay, please answer the
following question regarding slavery in America:

What were the primary economic, social, and/or political factors that led to the South’s
dependence on the institution of slavery, and what major political events in the late
18th/early 19th centuries resulted from the South’s unwillingness to abandon slavery?

https://archive.org/details/give-me-liberty-an-american-history-eric-foner-z-lib.org_20220819/page/n7/mode/2up

^^^link for a free pdf of the book, make references from chapter 11, and maybe chapters 4 and 14
I only need the textbook to be used as one reference, the others can be made from somewhat scholarly articles online

Persuasive Research Essay about the impact of pursuing postsecondary education

Persuasive Research Essay about the impact of pursuing postsecondary education

THE TOPIC I CHOSE WAS:  There are setbacks to pursuing a college degree
I ATTACHED THE PREWRITING ASSIGNMENT THAT HAS MY 3 KEY POINTS THAT YOU WILL USE &THE SCHOLARLY SOURCES YOU WILL ALSO NEED TO USE. PLEASE USE AT LEAST TWO OF THOSE SOURCES AND ANY OTHER SOURCES YOU FIND THAT WILL BE USEFUL. 
In developing your argument, you will take into account what you have learned about this issue from the assigned readings and your scholarly research findings. In addition to making your argument, your persuasive research essay must also address and refute a naysayer (i.e. opposing argument). Additionally, you are required to cite evidence from at least two assigned articles from Course Content > Assigned Readings and at least two credible, reliable scholarly/professional sources from the RCBC Library and/or Course Content > Suggested Articles.
Instructions
Your persuasive research essay must include a brief introduction paragraph, five to seven body paragraphs, and a brief concluding paragraph.
In your introduction, identify and discuss the topic you’ve chosen that is related to the benefits or disadvantages of college. This discussion in your introduction must include the viewpoints about the topic; that is, identify your side of the argument and the opposing side of the argument. Conclude your introduction paragraph with your thesis statement, which will state your main idea. Your thesis statement should answer the following question: what is your argument about the topic you’ve chosen about the benefits or disadvantages of college?
In five to seven body paragraphs, you will present and defend your argument, present and explain your opposition (i.e. counterargument/“naysayer”), and provide a rebuttal to disprove the opposition’s viewpoints. Remember: Your persuasive research essay must reference at least two assigned articles from Course Content > Assigned Readings and at least two reliable scholarly/professional sources from the RCBC Library and/or Course Content > Suggested Articles related to your topic. Each body paragraph must cite evidence from at least one source that supports that body paragraph’s main point. Whether you cite a direct quote or summarize a quote in your own words, you must include MLA-style parenthetical citations. When citing evidence as a direct quote, make sure you “sandwich” them, as described in Chapter 3: As He Himself Puts It- The Art of Quoting in They Say/I Say.
In terms of organizing your body paragraphs, think of your persuasive research essay as a written debate. For example:
  • The first three body paragraphs should present key points that support your argument (i.e. prove your thesis statement) with evidence from your sources.
  • Next, transition to one or two body paragraphs in which you address and explain your opposition’s point of view (i.e. counterargument/naysayer); again, you will be referencing evidence from your sources. For more information about counterarguments/naysayers, refer to “Chapter 6: Skeptics May Object” of the They Say/I Say textbook.
  • After discussing the naysayer, use the last one or two body paragraphs to strengthen your argument while weakening your opposition’s perspective by rebutting, or arguing against, the opposition’s point of view; that is, you will be pointing out the flaws in the opposition’s reasoning, with reference to evidence from your sources.
Your conclusion (one brief paragraph, approximately five sentences) will include a reiteration of your argument (thesis statement), a summary of the key points of your argument and your opposition, and an explanation of the importance of your position on the issue you’ve chosen regarding the benefits and/or disadvantages of college. Remember: Do not include new points, ideas, or evidence in the conclusion paragraph. If you did not present information in your body paragraphs, then you should not present that information as you wrap up your essay.
Include an MLA-style Works Cited page on a new page after your conclusion.
Formatting
  • Length: Seven to nine total paragraphs
    • Introduction paragraph
    • Five to seven body paragraphs
    • Concluding paragraph
  • Overall, the text of your essay must be at least 4 full pages and no more than 6 full pages. A Works Cited page is required but is not included in the page length requirement.
  • Line spacing: Double space
  • Font typeface: Times New Roman
  • Font size: 12
  • MLA formatting/documentation guidelines: Parenthetical citations and Works Cited page required. You must reference a minimum of four sources: two assigned articles and two scholarly articles about your argument. See Course Content > Helpful Resources: MLA Style Requirements folder for resources and templates.
  • Narrative point-of-view: First-person allowed; avoid filler phrases: I think, I feel, In my opinion
  • Essay must be attached/uploaded to this Assignment link.  See Course Content > Video: Submit an Assignment. Emailed submissions are not accepted.  If you accidentally submit the incorrect file, you may submit the correct file through this assignment submission link by the due date.
  • Before submitting, click the check box to agree to submit your paper to the plagiarism tool.
  • Accepted file types: Microsoft Word or PDF

Explain how the beginnings of the opioid epidemic in the United States, as presented in Dreamland, possess at least four of the ten distinguishing properties of a wicked problem as defined by Horst W.J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber.

“But now that these relatively easy problems have been dealt with, we have been turning our attention to others that are much more stubborn.”

 

Paper 3: In What Ways is the Opioid Epidemic a Wicked Problem?

 

Context

 

Provisional data from CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics found overdose deaths involving opioids increased from an estimated 70,029 in 2020 to 80,816 in 2021, a 15% increase. In 2000, this number was less than 10,000. In the span of just over twenty years, opioid overdose became the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, overtaking motor vehicle accidents. “Devestat[ing] hundreds of cities, small towns, and suburbs across America,” the opioid epidemic has profoundly impacted lives across the United States.

 

In Dreamland, Sam Quinones explains how and why opioids spread across the United States. Through his narrative, a picture emerges of an incredibly intricate problem that may never be completely understood and completely solved.

 

In many ways, the complexity found in the opioid epidemic’s beginnings embodies the distinguishing properties of a “wicked problem” first outlined by Horst W.J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber in “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” These problems are “ill-defined, and they rely upon elusive political judgment . . . [and] are never solved. At best they are only re-solved—over and over again.”

 

Assignment

 

Explain how the beginnings of the opioid epidemic in the United States, as presented in Dreamland, possess at least four of the ten distinguishing properties of a wicked problem as defined by Horst W.J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber.

 

To do this, students will need to first determine, based on their analysis and interpretation of Dreamland, the distinguishing properties of a wicked problem that are best seen in the beginnings of the opioid epidemic. Once the distinguishing properties are identified, specific illustrative examples need to be selected from Dreamland to demonstrate how the opioid epidemic possesses these distinguishing properties.

 

To make an effective and compelling argument, students cannot simply provide examples from the text. A strong argument will provide detailed explanation of the distinguishing properties of a wicked problem. Most importantly, a strong argument will provide detailed analysis and extended explanation as to how the supporting examples illustrate the distinguishing properties of a wicked problem.

 

A paper, for example, cannot simply state one distinguishing property of a wicked problem that the opioid epidemic possesses is that it is unique. A strong argument will provide ample examples, analysis, and thoughtful explanation of those examples to convince the skeptical reader that the opioid epidemic is, in fact, a unique phenomenon.

 

Because the argument for this paper hinges on the application of a theoretical idea, deep critical thinking will be vital for this assignment.

 

Evidence and Research

 

For this paper, students will create their argument with evidence from Dreamland and “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” It may be beneficial, however, to incorporate additional research to further enhance the persuasiveness of the claims. The uniqueness of the Xalisco boys’ drug distribution system, for example, can be better understood by comparing it other drug distribution systems. To do this effectively, however, it may be necessary to engage in additional research about other drug distribution systems.

 

Additional research gathered for this paper should only be used to enhance ideas generated from the student’s reading of Dreamland. The research should not be used to develop ideas and arguments that do not appear in Dreamland.

 

If gathering additional research, be sure that the research comes from credible

sources. Having high-quality evidence is essential to crafting a successful argument; a

strong and compelling argument cannot be made with poor, weak, and/or insufficient

evidence.

 

If students have any questions about the academic appropriateness of their sources,

please, please ask me or Peggy.

 

While drafting and writing the paper, feel free to reference previous class assignments

and material produced during this unit.

 

A Successful Paper Will

 

  • Embracing the complexities of the issue, be guided by a strong, controlling thesis statement, which makes a clear, claim as to how the opioid epidemic in the United States, as presented in Dreamland, possesses at least four of the ten distinguishing properties of a wicked problem as defined by Horst W.J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber

 

  • Consist of well-developed, complete, and focused body paragraphs

 

  • Provide sufficient, effective, and developed textual support (quotes, paraphrases, and examples) to support the analysis and argument being presented

 

  • Properly and effectively integrate and cite textual evidence to support the analysis and argumentative claims presented in the paper

 

  • Comprehensively explain and effectively contextualize the significance of the support to the claims being made

 

  • Be organized in a clear and effective way

 

  • Demonstrate skillful critical thinking and fully-develop and fully-defend essential argumentative claims

 

Unit Readings

 

Dreamland

 

“Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”

 

Length

 

Minimum: 6 full pages (not including a Works Cited page)

 

Format

 

12 pt. font, double-spaced with one-inch margins

 

 

 

 

 

 

Whether reproductive rights and access to resources such as contraceptives and safe childbirth given to individuals is beneficial to our society.

Whether reproductive rights and access to resources such as contraceptives and safe childbirth given to individuals is beneficial to our society.

Your paper must include: an introduction to the issue and a clear issue statement, an argument that supports your position, rebuttals of arguments that support contrary positions, a final conclusion that also includes suggestions on possible actions one can take on the issue. Be sure to cite your sources and provide a works cited page. Formatting should be double-spaced, 12-point font and one inch margins. Do not put large spaces between paragraphs. Indent paragraphs.

I have also done two previoius writing adsignments for this class that connect back to this assignment that I will upload down below. The writing of the 8 page must be an expansion of my writings and there will need to be cited sources. i will also be turning it in on turn it in so no plagirism.

Green Hydrogen in the Euro-Mediterranean region-Analysis of institutional communication strategies

Green Hydrogen in the Euro-Mediterranean region-Analysis of institutional communication strategies

The research Methodology needs to be improved and enhanced so that it is more solid and supports the theoretical framework in which I have considerably advanced. I need more or less 50 pages including the analysis of the documents with KH coder or another tool which will help me analyse the institutional documents and the media articles. I will attach the progress of the methodology of my thesis so that you can have an overview. Here are just a few lines about the ideas I have now for the methodology: The research methodology involves the use of a relational content analysis on the communication strategy on green hydrogen of the EC, the UfM, National Energy Action Plans (NECPs) of Spain and France and hydrogen strategies of Algeria and Morocco. All of these institutional reports are analysed considering three main variabes: strategies, barriers and targets. Also I include here the comments of my supervisor (I will also attach the document for a clearer view). Please take into account all the comments made and respond to them accordingly. I expect a well written methodology and also an anlysis of the documents with the presentation of the results and coclusion.

Why was there an increasing representation of aliens and parasites coming to infect and possess the minds of humans around the time of the Cold War?

Why was there an increasing representation of aliens and parasites coming to infect and possess the minds of humans around the time of the Cold War?

 

 

Here are some of the requirements: In general, you must develop an idea more complex than Phenomenon X is monstrous because it is frightening, or alternatively that Phenomenon X is truly a monster (and I can even cite the social science research to prove my point!)

You are identifying a research problem of the following sort: you are seeking to understand why a culture at a particular historical moment represents any given phenomenon as monstrous. The paper cannot consist only of a series of stitched together sources or be only a summary of the research you’ve accomplished.

I encourage you to develop a research question that you’re deeply committed to and find intellectually engaging. You’ll be living with this question and material for a long time the last month of the semester. Your question may very well shift and change as you become involved in research, but make sure you have a compelling starting point.

Option I: Take an historical approach. Consider how the representation of monsters has changed over a specified historical period. Or, consider how one of the texts we have read raise historical questions you’d like to research. I have already decided on a research question and made a rough annotated bibliography. Here is the question I want to explore: Why was there an increasing representation of aliens and parasites coming to infect and possess the minds of humans around the time of the Cold War?

there are more requirements that need to be met before I purchase. My paper must use a minimum of 8 secondary sources that are all either peer-reviewed or published works of literature. In addition, the essay must center on the primary source of Don Siegels 1956 Invasion of the Body Snatchers. I will also need an abstract, revised annotated bibliography, and a 2 page reflection on research and research process. The Reflection should focus on the following questions or issues:

Detail the process you went through in developing your topic, the challenges you faced finding the sources, and the strategies you developed to overcome those challenges.

Indicate how you developed the topic based on the sources you discovered.

Assess whether your research was thorough enough to provide a meaningful synthesis of the sources.

Discuss what you learned about the research process.

I have already identified some scholarly sources that could be used and made an annotated bibliography. Would the writers use some of those sources to make it look like I developed the essay from those sources?

Here is the annotated bibliography: Booker, M. Keith. Monsters, Mushroom Clouds, and the Cold War : American Science Fiction and the Roots of Postmodernism, 1946-1964. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 2001. Print.

In “Monsters, Mushroom Clouds, and the Cold War,” M. Keith Booker argues that the pod people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers represent communism and the loss of individuality. He highlights the era’s stereotypes about communists, which portrayed them as emotionless and conformist. This is reflected in the pod people’s repeated assurances to Miles that a life without emotion would be far more pleasant. The film also taps into the broader anxiety of the 1950s about the difficulty of distinguishing between “Us and Them,” exemplifying the era’s “doubleness” by offering multiple interpretations of the pod people’s significance.

Booker also discusses the film I Married a Monster, which he describes as the “feminine analogue” of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Unlike the male-dominated Body Snatchers, I Married a Monster features a woman who comes up with a solution to combat the aliens and expresses genuine sympathy for them. However, the film still embodies the 1950s paranoia about invasion and occupation by a subtle and invisible Other.

Finally, Booker introduces films that contrast the secretive method of invasion seen in Invasion of the Body Snatchers with the more aggressive, easily identifiable monsters present in other 1950s films like The Thing and Them! These films highlight a different kind of fear, where the enemy is visible and external rather than subtle and internal.

This source is valuable to my essay because it presents the idea of “Us vs. Them” and contrasts the film with films that seek to present the “Us vs. Them” idea in different ways.

Briley, Ron. “A Cold War State of Mind: Brainwashing and Postwar American Society.” Journal of American Culture 2015: 414–. Web.

In this article, Ron Briley explores the concept of brainwashing and its connection to communism in the context of postwar American society. He argues that the fear of brainwashing by communists during the Cold War was not merely a result of government propaganda, but rather a genuine concern among Americans who saw communism as a threat to their way of life. Briley also examines the weaknesses in American culture that made it susceptible to communist infiltration, specifically identifying the emasculation of men as a key factor. Through his analysis of films such as “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” Briley illustrates how the fear of brainwashing and the desire to maintain individualism and autonomy contributed to the portrayal of mind control in science fiction films of the 1950s.
Overall, this article provides valuable insights into the cultural and societal anxieties that fueled the anti-communist sentiment during the Cold War era. With this source, I can explain the fear associated with brainwashing and why America was so afraid of this concept.

Grant, Barry Keith. Invasion of the Body Snatchers, BFI Publishing, 2010. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.libproxy.berkeley.edu/lib/berkeley-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4762984.
Barry Keith Grant’s book “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” provides a comprehensive analysis of the 1956 science fiction film and its connections to the anxieties of the Cold War and communism. The book explores the depiction of the pod people in the film as representative of the communist threat and the fear of conformity. Grant analyzes certain quotes from the movie, such as the one near the end that references a “fragment of a wartime speech,” and highlights how they connect the film to the historical context in which it was released.
Moreover, the book delves into the gender roles and primal expression of masculine horror portrayed in the film. It suggests that the film was fueled by rapidly changing gender roles after World War II. The book provides a deeper insight into the different aspects of the film that are not immediately apparent upon watching it. It connects the movie’s themes and messages to the historical context and societal changes at the time of its release.
This source is useful because it gives me specific cases and scenes within the movie that allude to the communist threat. It also presents an argument about fear due to changing gender roles portrayed through the asexual pod people that I could later explore.

Hendershot, Cynthia. I Was a Cold War Monster : Horror Films, Eroticism, and the Cold War Imagination. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 2001. Print.

Hendershot’s book examines horror films produced during the Cold War period and their relation to cultural anxieties surrounding conformity, eroticism, and death. The author argues that films such as Invasion of the Body Snatchers use personal and erotic themes to counter the perceived danger of a conformist society. However, Hendershot also notes that the personal ultimately fails, and the characters often face a fine line between life and death. The book provides an in-depth analysis of Invasion of the Body Snatchers and its use of the sexual embrace between Miles and Becky as a metaphor for giving in to nature and death. According to Hendershot, the film uses this erotic relationship to represent the characters’ humanity and their struggle against conformity.

This source is useful in providing insight into the cultural anxieties of the Cold War era and the ways in which they were reflected in popular culture, particularly horror films. The book’s analysis of Invasion of the Body Snatchers provides valuable information for understanding the film’s underlying themes and their relationship to the cultural context of the time.

Hendershot, C. “The Invaded Body: Paranoia and Radiation Anxiety in ‘Invaders from Mars’, ‘It Came from Outer Space’, and ‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers.’” Extrapolation 39.1 (1998): 26–39. Web.

In her article, Hendershot argues that the themes of paranoia and radiation anxiety present in Invasion of the Body Snatchers can also be seen in other 1950s science fiction films such as Invaders from Mars and It Came from Outer Space. She notes that the fear of nuclear fallout and radiation is a prevalent theme in these films, and that Invasion of the Body Snatchers specifically alludes to this fear by depicting the pods falling from the sky in a manner similar to nuclear fallout. Additionally, Hendershot highlights the idea that the fear of the “pod people” in the film is also linked to a fear of asexual reproduction and the loss of love and sexual reproduction. She suggests that the film serves as an allegory for an America that is being transformed and poisoned in its sleep, particularly in the safety of suburban areas. (Hendershot 26-39).

This source is valuable because it doesn’t focus on the threat of communism but on the threat of nuclear fallout and current fears about sexuality. I can connect this source with other sources about fears about changing gender roles of the time.

Lukas, Scott A., and John Marmysz. Fear, Cultural Anxiety, and Transformation : Horror, Science Fiction, and Fantasy Films Remade. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books, 2009. Print.

In this source, Lukas and Marmysz delve into the specific reasons why conformity was so frightening during the Cold War era, and how horror films like Invasion of the Body Snatchers reflected those anxieties. They argue that the pods in Invasion of the Body Snatchers represent not only communism, but also the dissolution of the individual. By examining the ways in which conformity was perceived as a threat to personal identity and freedom during the Cold War, the authors shed light on why the invasion narrative was so resonant in popular culture during this period.

The authors also explore how the themes of fear and transformation were expressed in horror, science fiction, and fantasy films that were remade during the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Specifically, pages 27-36 of the book (Part 1: Fear Sections 2&3) offer an analysis of the version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers that was made during the Cold War. This source is particularly relevant to my essay as it provides valuable insight into the cultural and political anxieties of the time, and how they were reflected in the horror genre.

Matthews, Melvin E.. Hostile Aliens, Hollywood and Today’s News : 1950s Science Fiction Films and 9/11, Algora Publishing, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.libproxy.berkeley.edu/lib/berkeley-ebooks/detail.action?docID=319246.
In Chapter 2, “Hostile Aliens: The Mind Controllers,” Matthews argues that during the Cold War, mind control became associated with the communist threat. The fear of brainwashing by the Soviet Union influenced the depiction of mind control in films such as “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” He also explains that the fear of hidden traitors was not limited to the film industry but was pervasive in American society: “The fear that other traitors existed undetected within Western governments lasted for years” (Matthews 31). This paranoia about traitors and spies within the government provided the basis for the possession theme common in science fiction films of the 1950s.
Matthews also analyzes specific words and scenes from “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” that allude to the communist threat. For example, the pods that produce the alien duplicates are described as “non-individualistic” and “communistic” in nature. Additionally, the film’s emphasis on conformity and the loss of individuality is a commentary on the dangers of communism. The fear of losing individuality was not just a fear of communism but also a fear of the larger conformity of 1950s American society.
This source is important for my writing because it introduced the idea of brainwashing and conformity present within the specific film Invasion of the Body Snatchers. I can use this source to begin the discussion of why the pod people are monstrous.

Murray, Lawrence L. “The Film Industry Responds to the Cold War, 1945-1955: Monsters, Spys, and Subversives.” Jump cut 9 (1975): 14–. Print.

Lawrence L. Murray’s article “The Film Industry Responds to the Cold War, 1945-1955: Monsters, Spies, and Subversives” discusses the political context in which Hollywood produced anti-communist movies during the Cold War era. The article suggests that Hollywood’s anti-communist propaganda was a result of the US government’s investigation of Hollywood’s ties to communism and the Hollywood Ten’s refusal to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).

The article argues that during this period, Hollywood’s creative freedom was constrained by the pressure to conform to anti-communist ideals. Murray suggests that the investigation into Hollywood was initiated in part by the government’s concern about the potential influence of communist propaganda on the American public. This led to the creation of anti-communist films that portrayed communist threats in a negative light.

Moreover, Murray identifies Invasion of the Body Snatchers as a metaphorical representation of communism. The article suggests that the film embodies both pro-McCarthy and anti-McCarthy elements, depending on how one interprets the film’s message. The pod people in the movie are interpreted as communist infiltrators who seek to undermine American values and turn Americans into soulless, conformist beings. However, the film’s ending, where the protagonist warns the government about the threat of the pod people, could be seen as a criticism of McCarthyism’s excesses.

Overall, Murray’s article explores the relationship between Hollywood and the government during the Cold War and how this impacted the films produced during this era. This source will be useful in explaining that the development and concentration of anti-communist films in the 50s was not entirely due to fear but essentially required by the government.

I am not sure if they would be able to find all these sources online as some of them are physical books.

Hip Hop history and the African experience in the United States

Hip Hop history and the African experience in the United States

Hip Hop is a unique American cultural product — Hip Hop is neo African.  Discuss these statements in the context of the history of the African experience in the United States.  What is the role of music and dance in this history and how have these experiences manifested in hip hop?  Discuss this form in the context of the space, history, politics, culture(s), artists and philosophies that gave birth to the form, and the spaces/individuals/ institutions and/or processes that gave rise to its popularity.

(Some how bring in the discussion about jay z and the story of oj song and Beyonce and her homecoming performance).

5 pages

Needs to have at least 3 academic sources (at least 1 needs to be peer reviewed) and at least 7 other sources (can and should do more). At least 10 total sources. You also must appropriately cite scholars, online sources / videos, either in paraphrase or quotations.

Make sure the presentation of Main Concepts/Arguments is clear and well written at a masters degree level. You must use of Examples/Descriptions of Dance and Music. You also need to use examples of music and dance to support arguments. Descriptions of dances to help paint a picture or to exemplify how the dance is done in the mind of the reader.

Economic Indicators

1. Read the economic indicators (attached) and summarize them into 1.5-2 pages and add them to the Economic Factors section from the PESTEL analysis (attached).

Background: Both the Pestel Analysis and Economic Indicators are about the SOCIAL NETWORK industry.

philosophical essay

philosophical essay

Choose one of the prompts below and in approximately 500-900 words, answer every part of it as directly, thoroughly, and precisely as possible, explaining key ideas in your own words and citing evidence from the course’s assigned texts:

Prompt A [Descartes and Panikkar]:
Choose one thing that in your experience is often said about God. How certain do you think Descartes might say human beings can be that this assertion is true, and what reasons would he provide for his conclusion? In your view, would Panikkar likely agree or disagree with Descartes on this matter, and for what reasons? Do you personally think that this likely response by Panikkar to Descartes would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
Prompt B [Kant and Buber]:
Come up with your own original example of a ‘moral dilemma’, or other morally-relevant situation. What would Kant advise as the right course of action in this situation, and why (that is, by what method would he suggest this answer should be reached and why)? In your view, would Buber likely agree or disagree with Kant’s views on this matter, and for what reasons? Do you personally think that this likely response by Buber to Kant would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
Prompt C [Epicurus and Heidegger]:
Imagine that you were diagnosed with a terminal illness, and were told that you had only a short time, say 6 months, left to live. How should you respond to this news, according to Epicurus (and, conversely, what is one way you shouldn’t respond to it)? Do you suppose that Heidegger would agree or disagree with Epicurus’ advice to you, and why? What is some advice which Heidegger might offer you instead? Do you personally think that Heidegger’s likely response to Epicurus would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
—————————————————————————————————
Formatting:
12-point font, double-spaced. Cite appropriately (for any specific, direct attributions of claims to an author) either parenthetically at the end of sentences or in footnotes, indicating abbreviated source title and page number. Direct quotes and close paraphrases (considered together) should comprise no more than 30% of the text of your submission.
—————————————————————————————————-
Grading Criteria:
[Listed Roughly in order of importance, with ‘Relevance’ being the umbrella under which the other factors are understood.]
Relevance: Did you properly and fully address the prompt questions as they were asked?
Completeness/thoroughness: Did you answer every part of the question, explaining in your own words all the important key points of the content along the way?
Evidence (textual) provided: Did you make a solid case for your interpretation of the text by citing evidence in support of your specific claims about the author’s ideas?
Clarity/Precision of Expression: Did you write clearly, make your thoughts as transparent as possible to the reader, and choose words that aptly described what you meant to say? Did you include the material that is necessary in order to directly and completely respond to the question, avoiding confusing the reader with tangential thoughts?
Proper scholarship (citation format): Did you choose a coherent citation style and consistently stick to it? Did you cite readings that were assigned for the class?
—————————————————————————————————-
General Writing Tips:
– Answer the question as if you were answering someone who asked you in person (i.e., give a relevant, direct, complete answer; this does not mean that you should speak imprecisely or too informally).
– Explain key ideas in your own words, giving the reader the impression that you understand what you’re saying, but whenever attributing a claim to an author, cite (and in the few cases you directly quote, make sure to explain the quote).
– Don’t bother with flowery/drawn-out introductions or conclusion paragraphs; if you write these paragraphs at all, make them a very brief and to-the-point summary of the points you will make (or have made). In such a short submission, it’s likely better to skip them entirely and jump right into answering the question.
– Expect to include citations [but not necessarily direct quotes] often. Your citations are there to provide evidence that your claims about an author’s ideas are based in specific passages of the text, and to give your reader an easy way to understand how your claims constitute a direct interpretation of that text.
– You may cite the lectures, but your main source of evidence for your claims should be the text.
– This is an exercise in textual interpretation, not an encyclopedic summary of a thinker’s ideas. You should give only what background information is necessary to clarify your response to the prompt question, as it becomes relevant to the points you’re making.Choose one of the prompts below and in approximately 500-900 words, answer every part of it as directly, thoroughly, and precisely as possible, explaining key ideas in your own words and citing evidence from the course’s assigned texts:
Prompt A [Descartes and Panikkar]:
Choose one thing that in your experience is often said about God. How certain do you think Descartes might say human beings can be that this assertion is true, and what reasons would he provide for his conclusion? In your view, would Panikkar likely agree or disagree with Descartes on this matter, and for what reasons? Do you personally think that this likely response by Panikkar to Descartes would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
Prompt B [Kant and Buber]:
Come up with your own original example of a ‘moral dilemma’, or other morally-relevant situation. What would Kant advise as the right course of action in this situation, and why (that is, by what method would he suggest this answer should be reached and why)? In your view, would Buber likely agree or disagree with Kant’s views on this matter, and for what reasons? Do you personally think that this likely response by Buber to Kant would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
Prompt C [Epicurus and Heidegger]:
Imagine that you were diagnosed with a terminal illness, and were told that you had only a short time, say 6 months, left to live. How should you respond to this news, according to Epicurus (and, conversely, what is one way you shouldn’t respond to it)? Do you suppose that Heidegger would agree or disagree with Epicurus’ advice to you, and why? What is some advice which Heidegger might offer you instead? Do you personally think that Heidegger’s likely response to Epicurus would be well-reasoned, and why or why not?
—————————————————————————————————
Formatting:
12-point font, double-spaced. Cite appropriately (for any specific, direct attributions of claims to an author) either parenthetically at the end of sentences or in footnotes, indicating abbreviated source title and page number. Direct quotes and close paraphrases (considered together) should comprise no more than 30% of the text of your submission.
—————————————————————————————————-
Grading Criteria:
[Listed Roughly in order of importance, with ‘Relevance’ being the umbrella under which the other factors are understood.]
Relevance: Did you properly and fully address the prompt questions as they were asked?
Completeness/thoroughness: Did you answer every part of the question, explaining in your own words all the important key points of the content along the way?
Evidence (textual) provided: Did you make a solid case for your interpretation of the text by citing evidence in support of your specific claims about the author’s ideas?
Clarity/Precision of Expression: Did you write clearly, make your thoughts as transparent as possible to the reader, and choose words that aptly described what you meant to say? Did you include the material that is necessary in order to directly and completely respond to the question, avoiding confusing the reader with tangential thoughts?
Proper scholarship (citation format): Did you choose a coherent citation style and consistently stick to it? Did you cite readings that were assigned for the class?
—————————————————————————————————-
General Writing Tips:
– Answer the question as if you were answering someone who asked you in person (i.e., give a relevant, direct, complete answer; this does not mean that you should speak imprecisely or too informally).
– Explain key ideas in your own words, giving the reader the impression that you understand what you’re saying, but whenever attributing a claim to an author, cite (and in the few cases you directly quote, make sure to explain the quote).
– Don’t bother with flowery/drawn-out introductions or conclusion paragraphs; if you write these paragraphs at all, make them a very brief and to-the-point summary of the points you will make (or have made). In such a short submission, it’s likely better to skip them entirely and jump right into answering the question.
– Expect to include citations [but not necessarily direct quotes] often. Your citations are there to provide evidence that your claims about an author’s ideas are based in specific passages of the text, and to give your reader an easy way to understand how your claims constitute a direct interpretation of that text.
– You may cite the lectures, but your main source of evidence for your claims should be the text.
– This is an exercise in textual interpretation, not an encyclopedic summary of a thinker’s ideas. You should give only what background information is necessary to clarify your response to the prompt question, as it becomes relevant to the points you’re making.