what juul’s hiding

/in /by

What juul’s hiding

 

1. Take time to choose one of the two prompts and focus on writing a multi-paragraph essay as a response. I suggest you outline 2 or 3 reasons before you begin typing [suggested 10-15 minutes]

 

2. Expectations in essay response: [suggested 80-100 minutes]

*introduction introduces author, title of the article, enough background information to understand the controversy, and your own well stated thesis statement with your viewpoint

*two or more body paragraphs with M=main ideas supporting your thesis argument

*each body paragraph has E=evidence from the text and personal experience [where applicable]

*each body paragraph L=links the evidence to the main idea of the paragraph

*each body paragraph C=closes by proving the thesis true [stay on your side of the argument]

*uses at least one quote from the article with introductory phrase, paraphrase in your own words, and interpret its meaning based on your perspective

*transitional phrases between sentences and paragraphs

*meaningful conclusion why this topic matters

Ideas to include in the introduction

Author and title of article

Thesis

Topic sentence for paragraph 1 [first reason]

Evidence

Link evidence

Close by mentioning connection to thesis

Topic sentence for paragraph 2 [second reason]

Evidence

Link evidence

Close by mentioning connection to thesis

 

Conclusion: restate thesis:

Why this matters?

What is at stake?

Who suffers if we do not solve this?

article link

https://choices.scholastic.com/pages/news/what-juul-is-hiding.html?language=english

African History before colonialism

/in /by

African History before colonialism

I’ll just paste the instructions.

In a couple of weeks the class will end. This is just a reminder. You will write a research paper on African history before colonialism with my approval. I highly recommend you choose one of the ten discussion questions as your topic. So, you can save a lot of time by simply expanding the content to meet the required minimum 2000 word count.

Double-spaced; Times New Roman 12 font standard

No need for either footnotes or endnotes, but make sure you use your own words if you cite from your sources or paraphrase your readings.

Your paper should be formal with introduction, main body and conclusion. Pay attention of the length of each paragraph and make sure you switch from one paragraph to another smoothly.

As you complete your paper ask yourself the following questions:

  1. Is my thesis statement concise and clear?
  2. Did I follow my outline? Did I miss anything?
  3. Are my arguments presented in a logical sequence?
  4. Are all sources properly cited to ensure that I am not plagiarizing?
  5. Have I proved my thesis with strong supporting arguments?
  6. Have I made my intentions and points clear in the essay?
  7. Did I begin each paragraph with a proper topic sentence?
  8. Have I supported my arguments with documented proof or examples?
  9. Any run-on or unfinished sentences?
  10. Any unnecessary or repetitious words
  11. Varying lengths of sentences?
  12. Does one paragraph or idea flow smoothly into the next?
  13. Any spelling or grammatical errors?
  14. Quotes accurate in source, spelling, and punctuation?
  15. Are all my citations accurate and in correct format?
  16. Did I avoid using contractions? Use “cannot” instead of “can’t”, “do not” instead of “don’t”?
  17. Did I use third person as much as possible? Avoid using phrases such as “I think”, “I guess”, “I suppose”
  18. Have I made my points clear and interesting but remained objective?Did I leave a sense of completion for my reader(s) at the end of the paper?

    I included the book we’re reading from.

Society’s exploit on technology

/in /by

Society’s exploit on technology

write an argumentive essay about how society has abused the use of technology.

Using MLA style formatting, you are required to cite a minimum of four sources in the text of your paper and list those sources in the proper format on your “Works Cited” page that

immediately follows the text on the paper.

Be sure to proof to catch and fix any grammar problems.

At the end include a “work cited ” page below.

Genronlogy Final Paper

/in /by

Term Paper Assignment

Please note that this assignment is due during our finals meeting. Because of that no exceptions can be made for late work even in the case of illness. If illness or emergency occurs and it is documented the student may ask for an incomplete in the course in order to do the work and receive a letter grade.

The final paper gives students the opportunity to choose from one of three paper options.

  • Formatting: The paper should be 4-5 pages in length (before references), be single spaced, size

12 font. You have three paper options, therefore, your paper should follow the specific guidelines below guidelines below. Please note that the individual page guidelines are suggestions to illustrate the amount of time and space relatively to give to each aspect of the paper.

  • 72 points are awarded for the paper and 8 points

 

Evaluation Proposal Paper: The evaluation proposal paper will give you an opportunity to plan an evaluation of a program or policy utilizing the following general criteria

  1. (2.5 points) State the Program Goal (0.25 pages)
  2. (2.5 points) State the Program Objectives (0.25 pages)
  3. (5 points) Write the Program Description (1 pages)
  4. Details of how it works and is being implemented.
  5. (20 points) List the Program Evaluation Questions and justification for asking them (0.75 page) 1. Examples: need for the program, cost/benefit analysis, description of the structure,

description of the program outputs, impacts/outcomes

  1. (5 points) List the Sources of Evaluation Data (0.5 page)
  2. What data will you collect and from who.
  3. (20 points) Describe the Methods of Data Collection (0.75 page)
  4. When will you collect data and how will you measure the variables of interest?
  5. (5 points) How will information on program evaluation be presented and why this makes sense?

(0.5 page)

  1. Who are you trying to inform (donors, public, government).
  2. Graphs, charts, pamphlet, online report.
  1. (10 points) Provide references and in text citations as needed.

 

Research Proposal Paper: This paper will require you to come up with a research idea of your own! First, come up with a hypothesis related to some developmental topic. You will need to come up with background and significance for this hypothesis. Then, design a study that includes sampling, measurement, and data collection approaches sufficient to answer the questions you have posed. You must also come up with an analysis plan and expected results from those analyses. The expected results should be, in part, based on your background reading or pilot studies.

  1. (15 points) Introduction and Background (1 pages)
    2. (5 points) Hypothesis (0.125 pages)
    3. (5 points) Aims clearly defined (0.25 pages)
    4. (20 points) Approach and Analysis for each aim (1-2 pages each)
  2. (15 points) Expected results (0.25-0.5 pages per aim)
  3. (10 points) Potential Pitfalls and Solutions (0.25 – 0.5 pages for each aim)

 

Empirical Analysis Paper / Systematic Review: This paper will focus on delving into a critique of the literature. Focus on one paper from your review and critique the methodology and analyses of that particular paper. Finally, spend some time reflecting on the literature, and come up with a potential study that could be done to address the holes you may have found in the literature. The structure of the paper should include:

  1. (40 points) An evaluation of the literature on your topic (both theoretical and empirical). Provide a cohesive look at the studies that have already been completed on your topic (2.5 pages).
  2. (15 points) Choose one paper from your review, and critique the methodology and analyses of that paper (1 pages).
  3. (15 points) A section to review the limitations of the literature as a whole, and offer some indication of where future studies should go. (1 pages)

 

Online Museum Report (3-5 hours)

/in /by

Online Museum Report (3-5 hours)

Choose one online Museum to visit – you can visit any Museum site of your choice. To find a Museum website – google for example Museums in New York (or type a city of your interest) and a list of Museum websites will come up. Here are some major ones you can also google: Metropolitan Museum of Art (Met), Guggenheim, Getty, Louvre, MOMA, LACMA. Some of the Museums have virtual tours you can take while viewing the website.

Paper Guidelines

The paper should be composed using APA or MLA formatting guidelines and double-spaced, 12 pt text, and 1-inch margins. The paper needs to be a minimum of 2 typed full pages (500 words). This report needs to be for an online museum visit and should include the following:
4 Paragraphs with image of art work embedded/pasted in word doc. (5 points) Paper format – Organization, grammar, length, and sentence structure. (15 points)
Compare the online museum to the physical museum visit. (20 points)
Address how displaying work online connects or does not connect with an audience. (20 points)
Choose one art work from the museums collection and discuss 2 important visual elements. (Example: Line, color, balance, texture, etc… (20 points)
Describe the significance of the subject in the work of art you chose. (20 points)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

/in /by

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

 

A 30-year-old male presents with acute trauma.  The final diagnosis is DIC.

 

  1. Discuss the clotting mechanism.
  2. What do prolonged PT and aPTT tests indicate?
  3. Fibrin degradation and split products are common to DIC patients.  Why?
  4. Identify two additional conditions that can initiate DIC and how?

“Absalom and Achitophel”

/in /by

“Absalom and Achitophel”

Read “Absalom and Achitophel” by John Dryden, and compose an analysis of FOUR allusion
This assignment requires that you conduct outside research (not your textbook) about specific allusions within identified works.  Doing so will help you learn and, hopefully, understand more about selections, authors or the time period we are reading.  You are required to identify, research and explain each allusion in connection to the work. You should identify the location of the resources.
You MUST follow the organization, format and structure shown in the “Allusion Sample.doc” below.  Failure to do so will result in major point deductions.

Allusion Instructions:

YOU MUST follow the organization, format and structure provided in the Allusion

Sample when composing your allusions for this assignment.

*NEED ALL THESE FOR EACH ALLUSION

Source:

Allusion #1:

Allusion Identification:

Source Citation:

Allusion Significance:

While Wikipedia does offer helpful information, I WILL NOT ACCEPT a Wikipedia source as an authority on the subject. I also WILL NOT ACCEPT any sources like sparknotes,

cliffnotes, enotes, or dictionaries. Encyclopedias aren’t really proper sources either, so DO NOT use more than two encyclopedia-like sources per allusion assignment

Use current MLA-zuidelines to cite information. In addition to identifying the allusion,

offer

explanation of its significance to the work. In other words, why did the author include he allusion within a particular paragraph in the work? What is the connection? How does it help the selection’s message? Sometimes this can be accomplished by showing

the parallel between the allusion and some aspect of the assigned reading. I am

looking for your analysis. You should focus on one or two points and develop them.

Simply providing a list of significances without any details or explanations is not

acceptable.

The “Allusion Significance” is a big part of these assignments, so be sure and explain

them VERY THOROUGHLY. Anything less than 6 sentences in a “Allusion Significance” will not be acceptable.

ALLUSION DEFINITION:

Allusion – a figure of speech that makes a reference or representation of, or to, a well  known person, place, event, literary work, or work of art.

An allusion allows an author to make a powerful point without having to actually

explain it.

When using an allusion, the author assumes that the reader is familiar with the item

being alluded to.

Publishers use footnotes or side notes to help modern readers understand allusions

that may no longer be common knowledge, but not every footnote and side note is an allusion.

what impact does sustainability orientation have on non- financial corporate success

/in /by

what impact does sustainability orientation have on non- financial corporate success

This will be a Bachelor Thesis, literature research about that topic. It can be around 30-40 pages.
You can put as much references as needed.
About the writing style: The writing should be done in Times New Roman, font size: 12, footnotes: 10, line spacing:1,5. I can send you also what research questions i have thought.
I wanted to ask, is the price negotiable?

What impact does urbanization have on developing countries

/in /by

What impact does urbanization have on developing countries

This literature review has to answer the main question which I put as the topic but also these sub questions.

Sub questions:
How does urban development affect low income communities?
How does urbanization affect the health of those living in developing areas?
How does urbanization affect the environment in these developing areas?
Instructions from the professor:
Write a literature review synthesis of the findings in those 15 sources. This should follow the format of a standard
literature review as described in the pages below. This should be at least 1000 words long. The literature review
will summarize, synthesize and report what the literature sources that you list in your annotated bibliography say about the answer (or answers) to the research question you have posed. The literature review must
report, summarize and synthesize findings from the 15 sources in your annotated bibliography. They cannot report findings or cite any other sources (unless those are also in your annotated bibliography). I will check to make sure
 that the synthesis you provide in the literature review matches the abstracts of your sources in the annotated
bibliography. The literature review should be organized into several sub-sections – identified by separate
paragraphs – that report on different aspects of the answer to your research question.
I already have my 15 sources picked out as well as the citations for them. The annotated bibliography is attached
below. However, please include in-text citations. APA style.

Analyze the construction of Emma Bovary with respect to nineteenth-century notions of womanhood and hysteria

/in /by

Analyze the construction of Emma Bovary with respect to nineteenth-century notions of womanhood and hysteria

REQUIREMENTS:
– 2,500 words
– Title
– Bibliography
– Footnote Citations
– Single Spaced
PROMPT:
– Analyze the construction of Emma Bovary with respect to nineteenth-century notions of
womanhood and hysteria.
STRUCTURE:
– Read the question carefully and make sure you are answering it.
– An introduction should engage the reader’s attention, define any key terms, present the
topic, and flag your arguments.
– A conclusion is not simply a repetition of the introduction: it should draw the threads of
your arguments together. It can suggest possible future avenues of inquiry but should not
launch into new arguments. Good conclusions are harder to write than you think: give
them time, and don’t rush them at the last minute.
YOUR ARGUMENT:
– It is essential that your argument be drawn from close textual analysis of your primary
text(s) and that it be developed through reference to and integration of secondary sources.
– Do not simply retell the plot or describe the characters. Close textual analysis entails
moving beyond what the text ‘says’ to analyzing how it says it and what effects are
created in the process.
SECONDARY SOURCES AND REFERENCING:
– Use a minimum of three secondary sources (reference books, journal articles). Please
ensure you use scholarly sources (the author is an academic expert; the article appears in
a peer-reviewed journal; it adds to the body of knowledge in a field; arguments are
supported with academic sources).
– Be consistent and rigorous in your footnoting (or end noting) and referencing. We do not
impose a preference for style, but insist on consistent, coherent, and rigorous referencing.
Common styles used in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are MLA, Harvard, and
Chicago.
– Be scrupulous in acknowledging your sources, including when you use someone’s
material (even communicated in conversation) as general inspiration or background.
QUOTATIONS:
– As a rule, direct quotations of more than three lines are indented without quotation marks.
Shorter direct quotes should be in the body of the text with quotation marks.
– Please ensure you clearly indicate the edition of the primary text(s) in your referencing.
– If you have read the set text in its original language, it is acceptable to quote the original
in your essay.
– If you have consulted reference works in other languages, please quote the original in the
body of your essay and provide a translation into English in the footnotes.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ESSAYS:
– HIGH DISTINCTION:
– A sophisticated and nuanced argument, composed through skillful integration of
rigorous and insightful textual analysis and critical use of secondary sources. The
textual analysis demonstrates elements of originality. The whole is logically
structured, well-substantiated, and well-written. Referencing and bibliographic
formatting are exemplary.
– DISTINCTION:
– A well-developed and nuanced argument that integrates rigorous and in-depth
textual analysis with critical use of secondary sources. The whole is logically
structured, well-substantiated and well-written. Referencing and bibliographic
formatting are exemplary.
– CREDIT:
– A sound and generally well-structured argument demonstrates a thorough
knowledge of the primary text(s) and some in depth analysis. Secondary sources
are used appropriately, with few grammatical or spelling errors, and referencing
and bibliographic formatting demonstrate consistency and coherence.
– PASS:
– Argument is either not always sustained by evidence or is at times unclear. Some
attempt at analysis, but a tendency to be descriptive rather than critical. The
structure may, at times, be confusing or illogical. Referencing and bibliographic
formatting largely demonstrate consistency and coherence.
– FAIL:
– Insufficient engagement with the primary text(s) and/or factual errors with respect
to the primary text(s). Overall lack of coherence. Limited or no use of secondary
sources.
POTENTIAL READINGS:
– Beizer JL. Ventriloquized Bodies : Narratives of Hysteria in Nineteenth-Century France.
Cornell University Press; 1994.
– Amann E. Importing Madame Bovary the Politics of Adultery. 1st ed. 2006. Palgrave
Macmillan; 2006. doi:10.1057/9780312376147
– Arnaud S. On Hysteria : the Invention of a Medical Category Between 1670 and 1820.
(Ebooks Corporation., ed.). The University of Chicago Press; 2015.
– LaCapra D. Madame Bovary on Trial. Cornell University Press; 2018.
doi:10.7591/9781501720017
– Brooks M and NW. “‘Madame Bovary’: A Novel about Nothing.” In: Walder D, ed. The
Nineteenth-Century Novel : Identities. Routledge in association with Open University;
2001:9-28.
– Birken L. “Madame Bovary and the Dissolution of Bourgeois Sexuality.” Journal of the
history of sexuality (Online). 1992;2.4:609-620.
– Lehnert G. Elfriede Jelinek’s Lust and “Madame Bovary”: A Comparative Analysis. In:
Arens K, Johns JB, eds. Elfriede Jelinek : Framed by Language . Riverside, CA: Ariadne
Press, 1994. Ariadne Press; 1994:35-46.
– Marder E. Trauma, Addiction, and Temporal Bulimia in “Madame Bovary.” Diacritics
(Online). 1997;27(3):49-64.
– Weninger S. Madame Bovary’s Slipper. Nineteenth-century contexts (Online).
2010;32(3):235-243.
– Lee S. “Ma tête mise à nu:” Wigs and Wigmakers in Madame Bovary. Society of
Dix-Neuviémistes issuing body., ed. Dix-neuf. 2021;25(1):36-49.
– Per Bjørnar Grande. Desire in Madame Bovary. In: Desire. Michigan State University
Press; 2020:19-. doi:10.14321/j.ctv11vcdwg.5
– Moorjani AB. Madame Bovary’s Eroticized vehicle’. Neophilologus. 1980;64(1):48-53.
– Vinken B. “Loving, Reading, Eating: The Passion of Madame Bovary.” MLN (Online).
2007;122(4):207-213.
– Reis LC. ’The Cliché, the Discourse, and Desire of the Other in “Madame Bovary.”
Explicator (Online). 2014;72(1):57-60.