Follow the discussion questions participation and submission guidelines.

·      Follow the discussion questions participation and submission guidelines.

·      Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per DQ, with a minimum of three sentences each paragraph.

·      All answers or discussions comments submitted must be in APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.) 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4338-0561-5

·      Minimum of two references, not older than 2015.

Chapter 2: Frameworks for Professional Nursing Practice

1.  What are the specific competencies for nurses in relation to theoretical knowledge?

Week 8&9 Help.mp4.Play media comment.  Note – this was recorded before Faculty were not on campus from COVID restrictions.  Note that Appendix D below is the Evidence levels not B.  Also the Appendices below will assist you in deciding if qual or qual and then guide to levels and quality.  

Week 8&9 Help.mp4.Play media comment.  Note – this was recorded before Faculty were not on campus from COVID restrictions.  Note that Appendix D below is the Evidence levels not B.  Also the Appendices below will assist you in deciding if qual or qual and then guide to levels and quality.

Discussion– Individual evidence article summary.

Perform your literature search.  Use FSW library nursing databases.  Use the table on p298 in Dang & Dearholt. You will need to locate 2 articles/ references per level of evidence (total 10 references).   Sample document for the table of evidence is in course resources. Use Appendices D, E, F in Dang & Dearholt text to assist you in making the determinations.  You should be able to determine this information from writing the research analysis paper.  Reference listing must be included in the submitted document.

The professor will review your table for content and accuracy and return to you for potential corrections before inclusion in the final EBP paper.

Attach as a document in WORD to the discussion.  USE THIS DOCUMENT & DO NOT CHANGE FORMAT. APPENDIX- Individual Evidence rev.docx.Preview the document   Download document and save as Word document as . doc or docx.  No pdfs are accepted.

The following are tools to help you evaluate your articles for evidence table.  Also found in Dang & Dearholt text.

Faculty will provide feedback on changes needed to this document. You must revise the Appendix A table as indicated by faculty.

Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:

Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:

  1. Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
  2. Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
  3. Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning.
  4. Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication.

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubic_Print_Format

Rubic_Print_Format

Course CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal Points
NRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Assessment Part II150.0
CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned
Content80.0%
SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status20.0%SDOH affecting family health status, and the direct impact to the family, are not presented.SDOH affecting family health status are partially presented. SDOH listed are not relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are unclear. There are inaccuracies.Key SDOH affecting family health status are summarized. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are generally discussed. More support or rationale is needed in some areas.The overall SDOH affecting family health status are accurately identified and described. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed.The SDOH directly affecting family health status are relevant, accurately identified and thoroughly described. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail. The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on family health status.
Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations20.0%Age-appropriate screenings are not presented.Screenings are presented for some family members. The screenings are not age appropriate. Screenings are not relevant to the information gathered through family health assessment.Screenings are presented for each family member. Screenings are generally age appropriate, but entirely not relevant based on the information gathered through family health assessment. More rationale and support is required.Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate. Screenings are relevant and based on the information gathered through family health assessment. Some minor rationale or support is needed.Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate and highly relevant. Screenings correlate to the information gathered through family health assessment. Strong rationale and support is presented.
Assessment of Health Model20.0%A health model to assist in the creation of a plan of action is not presented. The model chosen is not a health model.A health model is selected to assist in creating a plan of action. The description of the model is incomplete. It is unclear why the chosen model is best for this family.A health model is selected and described. A summary of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. A general overview for why it is best for this family is provided. More rationale and support is required.A health model is selected and described. A discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are provided. Some rationale or support is needed.A health model is selected and thoroughly described. A detailed discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are clearly outlined. Strong rationale and support are provided to support reasoning.
Application of Health Model20.0%Family-centered health promotion using selected health model is omitted.Steps for a family-centered health promotion are partially presented. The health promotion is not based on the health model. Significant aspects are missing. There are major inaccuracies.The health model is used to create a general family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome require more detail to illustrate a clear plan of action. A general plan for communication with the family is presented. More rationale and support is required.The health model is used to create a relevant family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are illustrated. Strategies for communication with the family are presented.The health model is used to create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are described in detail. Appropriate strategies for communication with the family are clearly presented. The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve desired outcomes.
Organization and Effectiveness15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose5.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction5.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0%Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage100%

Resume Feedback

cid:sys_attachment.dosys_ided8518d113a26a0026b835528144b0ca@SNC.9507aef0cb9fd894

Resume Feedback

 

Student Information
Student Name:

Career Development Name: 
Date Submitted:11/19/2020

Date Replied:12/10/2020

Utilized Resume Builder: Ensures consistent style and format easily and effectively
Uploaded to Career Center: Ensures resume is easily accessible and available for employers
Resume Evaluation:

 

 

To stand out from other applicants and be chosen for an interview, it is critical to have a professional, well-written resume. Creating a Career Ready resume can take several revisions – so to save time formatting and ensure consistency, utilize the Resume Builder which is a part of the Herzing University Career Center in Canvas. Below is feedback regarding the submitted resume for review. Please feel free to reach out for additional resume or career readiness support at any time.

 

Spelling and Grammar
|_| Correct spelling, punctuation and grammar

|_| Appropriate tense for current and past roles

|_| Familiar acronyms and abbreviations only

|_| Uses active verbs and no pronouns

· Make sure that anything with current education and experience uses present verb forms, and any past education or work experience is put in the past form

· When describing duties, responsibilities, or accomplishments, include action verbs such as implemented, directed, improved, etc.

 

 

 

Style and Format
|_| Experience is in reverse chronological order|_| Professional email address
· Make sure to have month and year for every work or education highlight

· Herzing address is fine, make sure you keep active with it after graduation

 

 

 

Content
|_| Describes what was accomplished quantitatively vs. duties performed

|_| Includes university and expected degree

|_| Summary or Profile has 2-3 relevant sentences or 5-8 bullets

|_| Lists certifications, honors, awards, badges

· Include more of your accomplishments, accolades, and specific goals that you met or exceeded – what was unique that you did in addition to the standard duties and responsibilities

· At the beginning include a summary/objective with a brief statement that describes your professional background, skills, and why you are the best person for the position

· Make sure all dates including education points have the starting month and year as well as the anticipated graduation month and year

 

 

 

Other
· Work experience isn’t the same as professional experience! Professional experience is more in-line with what you want to do for your career

· The resume builder is a great tool for getting started, but we need to add a lot more to make your resume proficient. Formatting is ok, but needs to be more uniform and cleaned up. More details can be added for your experiences. Let’s connect in the next few weeks to make your resume move up a few quality notches!

 

 

Confidential, Not for Distribution Outside Herzing University Rev. 07.01.2019

Hamric’s Integrative Model of Advance Practice Nursing

On the Discussion Board, we will be exploring conceptual models.

Hamric’s Integrative Model of Advance Practice Nursing

The AACN Synergy Model

Strong Memorial Hospital’s Model of Advance Practice Nursing

Shuler’s Model of Nurse Practitioner Practice

This week you will describe how these models may help APNs articulate professional role identify and function. Conceptual models will serve as a framework for organizing beliefs and knowledge about your professional roles and competencies and provide a basis for further development of knowledge.

Question: Select one model from the above list and read the original source description. Address how well the model meets the following purposes:

a. Helping to organize your beliefs and knowledge about advanced practice nursing

b. Providing structure for research on advanced practice nursing

c. Providing a coherent structure in which concepts important to advanced practice nursing are identified and related to one another

d. Guiding curriculum development for advanced practice nursing

e. Allowing practitioners to see the bigger picture so that they can provide holistic and comprehensive care

Guidelines: Support your responses with scholarly academic references using APA style format. You are not writing an APA paper–but citing your sources in APA format.

Ego Integrity Presentation

Assignment Description

Ego Integrity Presentation

Imagine you are working as a charge nurse in an assisted living facility. Your unit houses twenty older adults. The residents of this unit are cognitively functional without evidence of cognitive decline. The residents are elderly and do require varying degrees of physical assistance with ADLs. Create a PowerPoint outlining strategies you can incorporate in the assisted living facility to promote ego integrity for your residents. What group and individual activities can you incorporate?

Assignment Expectations:

Length: 10-15 content slides

Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, and reference slide in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum content slide count for this assignment. Be sure to fully explain all slides in the Speaker Notes.

References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.

Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.

Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PPT document (.pptx)

Part one: explain the differences between clinical and personal mental health recovery and discuss how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders.

Part one: explain the differences between clinical and personal mental health recovery and discuss how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders.

Part two: reflect on how you, as a future registered nurse, can use therapeutic communication skills (e.g. active listening, probing, empathic responding) to assist a consumer living with the effects of a psychotic disorder identify their strengthens and embark on a personal recovery journey. Include no more than two examples of communication skills in your answer.

Support your explanation and reflections with peer-reviewed articles, including nursing literature.

Case Study Appendicitis

Case Study Appendicitis

 

difficulty: Advanced

setting: Hospital

index Words: appendicitis, assessment, developmental care, differential diagnosis, maintenance fluid calculations, discharge teaching, legal aspects, outcomes management, preoperative care, postoperative care

giddens Concepts: Clinical Judgment, development, Inflammation, Pain, Tissue Integrity

Hesi Concepts: Advocacy/ethical/Legal Issues, Assessment, Clinical decision Making—Clinical Judgment, developmental, Inflammatory, Pain, Tissue Integrity

 

 

 

 

 

R.O. is a 12-year-old girl who lives with her family on a farm in a rural community. R.O. has four siblings who have recently been ill with stomach pains, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever. They were seen by their pri- mary care provider (PCP) and diagnosed with viral gastroenteritis. A week later, R.O. woke up at 0200 cry- ing and telling her mother that her stomach “hurts really bad!” she had an elevated temperature of 37.9 ° C (100.2 ° F). R.O. began to vomit over the next few hours, so her parents took her to the local emergency department (ed). R.O.’s vital signs, complete blood count, and complete metabolic panel were normal, so she was hydrated with IV fluids and discharged to home with instructions for her parents to call their PCP or to return to the ed if her condition did not improve or if it worsened. Over the next 2 days, R.O.’s abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant, she refused to eat, and she had slight diarrhea. On the third day, she began to have more severe abdominal pain, increased vomiting, and fever that did not respond to acetaminophen. R.O. has returned to the ed. Her Vs are 128/78, 130, 28, 39.5 ° C (103.1 ° F).

· scenario

 

R.O. is guarding her lower abdomen, prefers to lie on her side with her legs flexed, and is crying. IV access is established, and morphine sulfate 2 mg IV is administered for pain. An abdominal CT scan confirms a diagnosis of appendicitis. R.O.’s white blood count is 12,000 mm3.

 

1. Which of the following are common clinical manifestations of appendicitis? Select all that apply.

a. Diarrhea

b. Vomiting

c. Left lower quadrant abdominal pain

d. Constipation

e. Arthralgia

f. Diffuse rash

g. Fever

 

 

 

 

 

2. Discuss why R.O.’s presenting clinical manifestations make diagnosis more difficult. Identify two other possible diagnoses.

 

Part 2 Pediatric, Maternity, and WoMen’s HealtH cases

 

 

 

 

598

Copyright © 2016 by Mosby, Inc., an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

12 Pediatric Disorders

 

Case Study Progress

The abdominal CT scan confirms that R.O. has appendicitis. The ed physician has written orders.

 

3. Note whether the orders are appropriate or inappropriate and give rationale.

 

 

Chart View

Emergency Department (ED) Orders

a. Make patient NPO

b. Place a peripheral IV and begin D5½NS at 80 mL/hr

c. Administer Fleet Enema now to rule out impaction

d. Administer morphine sulfate 2 mg IV q2h for pain

e. Obtain surgical consent from patient

f. Administer cefotaxime (Claforan) IVPB, at 150 mg/kg/day q6h

 

 

4. R.O.’s weight is 42 kg, and her height is 155 cm. Calculate her maintenance fluid needs and discuss how these will be met.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. R.O.’s parents give informed consent, and R.O. assents to the surgery after the procedure is explained to her. Why is it important for R.O. to provide her assent for the procedure?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. What should be included in the preoperative teaching for R.O. and her parents?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case Study Progress

R.O. undergoes an appendectomy; the appendix has ruptured. The peritoneum is inflamed and abscesses are seen near the colon and small intestine. R.O. is admitted to the surgical unit; she is NPO, has a nasoga- stric tube (NGT), Foley catheter, IV line, abdominal dressing, and a Penrose drain.

7. Identify the priority nursing considerations. Select all that apply.

a. Reduced bowel function

b. Pain

c. Skin integrity changes

d. Cardiac output changes

e. Changed family processes

f. Potential hypothermia

g. Potential fluid and electrolyte imbalance

Case Study Progress

On postoperative day 2, R.O. continues to improve and is tolerating ice chips. Breath sounds are clear, and she is performing her pulmonary hygiene. NGT has minimal drainage. The Foley catheter and Penrose drain have been removed, and her urine output is adequate. Her IV line is saline locked. The incision is well approximated with no drainage or redness. Her pain is 4 to 6 out of 10 with pain medication every 4 hours. Later that evening your assessment shows that R.O. is pale and listless; bowel sounds are absent; abdomen is distended and tender to the touch; the NGT is draining an increased amount of dark, green- ish black fluid. Her lung sounds are moist bilaterally, and her temperature has spiked to 40.2 ° C (104.4 °

F), O2 saturation is 97% on room air. she rates her pain at 10 out of 10 and is having difficulty taking deep breaths because of the pain, which she says “hurts over my whole stomach.”

8. What actions would you take?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Using SBAR, what would you communicate to the surgeon?

 

 

 

 

 

10. What will you consider as part of your nursing management of R.O.’s pain?

Case Study Progress

The surgeon assesses R.O. and orders an immediate return to the operating room. R.O. returns to surgery, where she has lysis of adhesions, removal of necrotic bowel, and drainage of an abscess. The surgeon has left her abdominal wound open and has ordered wound packing changes twice daily and abdominal irrigation with normal saline. R.O. cries and becomes agitated when you go to perform the procedure.

 

11. Which of the following pain and coping concepts would you question as you assist R.O to prepare for the procedure?

a. R. may fear loss of control during the dressing change.

b. R. may fear separation from family members during painful experiences.

c. R. is concerned about privacy during the dressing change.

d. Prior coping strategies can be used to prepare for the dressing change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

12. In anticipation of R.O.’s discharge, identify expected outcomes that must be achieved before discharge from the hospital.

Case Study Progress

After a week, R.O. continues to meet expected outcomes, with her wound healing well. Her discharge to home is planned for the next day. you provide discharge teaching to R.O. and her parents.

13. Which of these statements would indicate that more teaching is required?

a. “We need to return if R.O. begins vomiting again or develops a fever.”

b. “R.O. should wait 1 week before returning to her gymnastics program.”

c. “We will keep the incision clean and call if we see redness or drainage.”

d. “R.O. can advance her diet to the regular foods that she likes to eat.”

Case Study Outcome

R.O. is discharged to home with her parents and has an uneventful recovery. she is scheduled for a follow-up visit with the surgeon in 2 weeks.

Assessment two: reflective essay regarding the personal recovery for people living with a psychotic disorder

Marking Rubric

Assessment two: reflective essay regarding the personal recovery for people living with a psychotic disorder

Assessment Item 2: Reflective Essay (50%)

High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail

Part One: In relations to mental health, explain the differences between clinical and personal concepts of recovery and discuss how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders. Marks available 35%

35- 30 Marks A comprehensive explanation of the differences between clinical and personal recovery and a discussion of how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders is clearly established. The explanation and discussion are supported with depth and developed with clear reference to peer reviewed literature. Explanation and discussion are developed as a result of scrupulously considering, integrating and comparing the referenced sources. Sentences and paragraphs clearly relate to each other, and paragraphs effectively consolidate meaning. Ideas and arguments are developed and strengthened throughout the paper, and a central thesis is clearly established.

29 – 26 Marks A comprehensive explanation of the differences between clinical and personal recovery and a discussion of how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders is clearly established. The explanations and discussion are supported with a clear understanding of the peer reviewed literature cited. The discussion considers, integrates and compares the referenced sources. The sentences and paragraphs are related, and paragraphs effectively consolidate meaning. Ideas and arguments are developed throughout the paper, and a central thesis is developed.

25 – 23 Marks An explanation of the differences between clinical and personal recovery and a discussion of how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders are provided. The explanation and discussion are clear, but not comprehensive. The explanations and discussion are supported with some understanding of the peer- reviewed literature cited; however, the literature is not thoroughly compared or integrated; most of the discussion consists of independent claims, that do not involve a cross- comparison of the literature. The sentences and paragraphs are related in a general sense but are not explicitly linked. There is some attempt at developing a central thesis.

22- 18 Marks An explanation of the differences between clinical and personal recovery and a discussion of how personal recovery can enhance the wellbeing of people who experience psychotic disorders are provided. The explanation and discussion are not comprehensive and sometimes not clear. The explanations and discussion are supported with limited and basic understanding of the cited peer- reviewed literature, which is not compared or integrated. The sentences and paragraphs are mostly related, but at times are not clearly linked or well- structured. There is no attempt at developing a central thesis.

17 – 0 Marks An explanation of the differences between clinical and personal recovery is not provided, AND/Or; A discussion of how personal recovery can enhance wellbeing for people experience psychotic disorders is not provided, AND/Or; The essay primarily consists of superficial statements, the discussion is not developed beyond cursory mention or identification of significant concepts, and the sentences and paragraphs have no thematic development, AND/OR; The explanation and/or discussion is not clearly based on peer- reviewed literature, AND/OR; The sources used are inappropriate.

Part two: Reflect on how you, as a future registered nurse, can use therapeutic communication skills to assist a person living with the effects of a

35-30 Marks Provides an in-depth and personalised reflection about how they can use one to two skills to assist a person living with the effects of a psychotic disorder to identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey.

29-23 Marks Provides an in-depth reflection about how they can use one to two communication skills to assist a person living with the effects of a psychotic disorder to identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey.

25-23 Marks Provides a reflection about how they can use one to two communication skill to assist a person living with the effects of a psychotic disorder to identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey.

22-18 Marks Provides a superficial reflection about how they can use one to two communication skills to assist a person living with the effects of a psychotic disorder to identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey

17-0 Marks Provides little to no reflection about how they can assist a person living with the effects of a psychotic disorder to identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey, AND/OR

 

 

psychotic disorder identify their strengths and embark on a personal recovery journey Marks available 35%

Reflections are well supported with peer-reviewed nursing literature and are developed as a result of scrupulously considering, integrating and comparing the referenced sources. The reflection is written with sentences that clearly relate to each other, and paragraphs that effectively consolidate meaning. The arguments are developed and strengthened throughout the paper, and a central thesis is clearly established.

Reflections are supported with a clear understanding of the peer reviewed nursing literature cited. The discussion considers, integrates and compares the referenced sources. The sentences and paragraphs are related, and paragraphs effectively consolidate meaning. Ideas and arguments are developed throughout the paper, and a central thesis is developed.

Reflections are supported with some understanding of the peer- reviewed nursing literature cited; however, the literature is not thoroughly compared or integrated; most of the discussion consists of independent claims, that do not involve a cross- comparison of the literature. The sentences and paragraphs are related in a general sense but are not explicitly linked. There is some attempt at developing a central thesis

Reflections are supported with some nursing peer-reviewed literature; but are not thoroughly integrated, compared or related. The sentences and paragraphs are mostly related, but at times are not linked or well-structured. There is no attempt at developing a central thesis.

 

Reflections are not supported with peer-reviewed nursing literature AND/OR; Reflections are not developed beyond cursory mention or identification of significant concepts, and the sentences and paragraphs have no thematic development, AND/OR; The sources used are inappropriate.

Introduction and Conclusion Paragraphs Marks available 10%

10 – 9 Marks Introduction succinctly outlines the significance of personal recovery for people who experience psychotic disorders and previews the main points of the essay. Conclusion concisely draws together the main points and implications.

8 Marks Introduction succinctly outlines the topic of the essay and its main points. Conclusion concisely sums up the main points of the essay.

7 Marks Introduction states the topic of the essay and its main points. Conclusion sums up main points of the essay. Both introduction and/or conclusion could be written more succinctly.

5 – 6 Mark Introduction states the topic of the essay and its main points. Conclusion sums up the some of the main points of the essay. Both introduction and/or conclusion could be written more clearly and succinctly.

4 – 0 Marks There is no introduction, or the introduction lacks a clear focus. There is no conclusion, or the conclusion fails to draw together the main points.

Academic Writing Marks available 10%

 

10 – 9 Marks Essay is clearly written, easy to read, uses appropriate vocabulary, with few or no grammatical errors

8 Marks Essay is clearly written, easy to read, uses appropriate vocabulary, with minor grammatical errors that do not affect clarity.

7 Marks The writing is generally comprehensible. There may be some errors in grammar, spelling and vocabulary that affect clarity.

5 – 6 Marks The writing needs improvement. There are multiple errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity.

4 – 0 Marks The writing requires effort and concentration to understand. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity of communication.

Referencing adheres to APA 7th or Harvard (UTS) Marks available 10%

10 – 9 Marks Referencing is consistent with chosen style (Harvard UTS of APA 7th), very few errors made and at least 15 references have been used.

8 Marks Referencing errors are made infrequently, but errors do not obscure author identity or source origin and at least 12 references have been used.

7 Marks Referencing errors are made, but errors do not obscure author identity or source origin and at least 10 references have been used.

5 – 6 Marks Referencing errors are made, but errors do not obscure author identity or source origin and at least 9 references have been used.

4 – 0 Marks Referencing errors are frequent, AND/OR; The identity of authors/origin of 2 or more sources is unclear, AND/OR; Any discrepancies between in-text references and the reference list, AND/OR; Less than 10 references have been used.