The nursing student should be able to identify seizure activity, how to educate the family and or caregiver of the pediatric patient on what to do if a seizure occurs and what medications to administer,

Purpose

The nursing student should be able to identify seizure activity, how to educate the family and or caregiver of the pediatric patient on what to do if a seizure occurs and what medications to administer, implement safety to prevent injury and treatment of fracture. Develop education to support discharge based on assessment of data.

Competency

Prioritize nursing interventions when caring for pediatric clients with health disorders.

Scenario

A 5-year-old Gabriel is a multiracial male weighing 48 lbs with an allergy to penicillin arrives in the emergency room, no cultural considerations identified. You are handed the following notes on the patient that read:

He arrived in ER with his mother after falling out of bed after jerking movement activity as witnessed by his older brother while sleeping. Right-upper extremity appears with deformity. Mother and child speak English. Child has no significant medical history. Mother reports incontinent of urine during episode.

Your Assessment

Vital Signs: T 102.9, P 135, R 24, BP 118/60, O2 sat 100% RA

General Appearance: appears drowsy; face flushed, quiet

Neuro: oriented X3

Cardiovascular: unremarkable

Respiratory: lungs clear

Integumentary: very warm, dry

GI/GU: abdomen normal

Physician Orders

  • Complete Blood Count (CBC)
  • Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP)
  • Urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (U/A C&S)
  • Blood Cultures x 2
  • X-rays kidneys,
  • Influenza screening
  • Acetaminophen 15 mg/kg PO now
  • Ibuprofen 10 mg/kg PO now
  • Pad side rails
  • Suction at bedside with seizure precautions
  • Radiographs of right arm
  • Cast to right arm
  • Start PO fluids and increase as tolerated

The physician discharges Gabriel from ER to home with a diagnosis of; Right ear infection, Acute Febrile Seizure and fracture of the right ulna.

Discharge orders include:

  • Follow up with pediatrician in 7 days
  • Follow up with pediatric orthopedics in 7-10 days
  • Cefuroxime 30mg/kg PO BID for 10 days not to exceed 1,000mg daily. What is the recommended dosage if cefuroxime is supplied as an oral suspension 125mg/5ml or 250mg/5ml?
  • Acetaminophen 15 mg/kg PO Q4 hours PRN fever or pain and ibuprofen 10 mg/kg PO Q6 hours PRN fever and pain for up to 3 days
  • Acetaminophen is available as 160 mg/5 mL. Ibuprofen is available as 100 mg/ 5 mL.
  • What is the amount of acetaminophen in mg and ml per dose? What is the amount of ibuprofen in mg and ml per dose?
Instructions

Develop a discharge plan with three goals listed in order of priority, prior to discharge from current orders. Provide rationale for why you listed the goals in a particular order. Also, list three nursing interventions to meet each of the goals (you should have nine interventions in total). Last, give the mother the exact dosage she will need to give the child for acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and the cefuroxime when she gets home and explain why the exact dosage is important.

Prioritize nursing care strategies for clients with cardiovascular disorders.

Competency

Prioritize nursing care strategies for clients with cardiovascular disorders.

Scenario

Cardiac disease a one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Since it is so prevalent, you want to ensure your co-workers are fully prepared to care for patients. You are hosting a lunch to provide a refresher on heart disease and how to care for patients. During the lunch, you will present a PowerPoint Presentation to your co-workers.

Instructions

Choose one of the cardiac diseases that we covered in the last two modules. Within your presentation include:

  • Provide a detailed overview of the disease process
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
  • Multidimensional care including risk reduction, health promotion, and nursing interventions specific to the disease process

EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 1

Running head: EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 1

EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Searching and Evaluating Scientific Resources

Student Name

Institutional Affiliation

Date

Searching and Evaluating Scientific Resources

Introduction

Patient satisfaction in the emergency care department can be enabled through the reduction of lengthy waits. The Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) can be imperative in the changes. An understanding of the cause of lengthy waits and emergency responses in the hospital unit is required to support the EDIS solution provided. The evaluation and analysis of the three articles will portray the article’s credibility and importance in the research study.

Articles Summary

The quality and safety of patients in the emergency unit have to be enabled in emergency care. This follows guidelines and standard practices followed by practitioners in the waiting environment as per the emergency care report (2020). Information system integrations have to consider the mandatory requirements. This is to ensure effective support of the entire process in initial health assessment, care, and treatment after admission. In addition, the information system has to provide clear communication protocols to all stakeholders in the emergency unit.

Staff productivity in the emergency care unit in reducing lengthy waits is determined by policies and systems applied in the provision of acute health care. This can be hugely influenced by patients’ perceptions of satisfaction after the implementation of the policies and systems (Unwin et al., 2016). Planning of realistic policies is imperative in incorporating communication protocols to emergency department workflow for reduced complications and complaints.

Reducing lengthy waits in the emergency department can lead to a reduction in healthcare problems. This entails reduced delays in treatment increasing illnesses and injuries. The length the patient waits plays as a driver towards patient satisfaction (Vashi et al., 2018). Information systems integration is reflected in emergency bed utilization and team communication for effectiveness and efficiency.

Article Credibility

The emergency care report’s credibility can be considered on the basis of observing set principles and guidelines in enabling safety and quality in emergency care. This is significant in articulating how patient waits can be impacted by manual documentation processes. A consideration of the NSW health policies and plans in preventing patient dissatisfaction also increases the article’s validity.

Urwin’s article credibility has been enabled through the close assessment of a sample population in a particular hospital. Through a cross-sectional survey and SPPS data analysis, information gathered was supported. Conclusive support of evidence from the research increases the study’s validity and its use.

The article on the application of lean principles by Vashi articulates the use of systems to reduce overcrowding and low quality in the emergency department. Its credibility has been enabled by the consideration of existing ED prioritized flow design and changes that can be made to increase efficiency. Further, the article widens the value stream scope of technology in emergency care.

Article Importance

The emergency care report (2020) will be imperative in increasing my understanding of how EDIS application can change procedures in ED. This will ensure that the proposed recommendation regards existing protocols, procedures, and policies from the health sector. An increased examination of designed and redesigned ED workflows will enhance the integration of information systems in emergency care (Vashi et al., 2018). A utilization of Urwin’s article will enable the identification and examination of patient perceptions on satisfaction from systems incorporation in the ED.

Conclusion

Combating lengthy waits in the emergency department can be imperative in increasing patient satisfaction. This can be influenced positively by the application of EDIS in the hospital unit. An evaluation of the articles has presented article credibility and significance in the research study. This will influence the utilization of EDIS in reducing emergency care waits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Emergency care report (2020). Emergency department patients waiting care. Retrieved from https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/manuals/Documents/pmm-6.pdf

Unwin M., Nurs, G., Kinsman, L, Rigby, S. & Nurs, G. (2016). Why are we waiting? Patients’ perspectives for accessing emergency department services with non-urgent complaints. International emergency nursing 29.

Vashi, A., Sheikhi, F., Nshton, L., Ellman, J., Rajagopal, P. & Asch, S. (2018). Applying lean principles to reduce wait times in the VA emergency department. Military medicine 184(1).

EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES

Running head: EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 1

EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Searching and Evaluating Scientific Resources

Student Name

Institutional Affiliation

Date

Searching and Evaluating Scientific Resources

Introduction

Patient satisfaction in the emergency care department can be enabled through the reduction of lengthy waits. The Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) can be imperative in the changes. An understanding of the cause of lengthy waits and emergency responses in the hospital unit is required to support the EDIS solution provided. The evaluation and analysis of the three articles will portray the article’s credibility and importance in the research study.

Articles Summary

The quality and safety of patients in the emergency unit have to be enabled in emergency care. This follows guidelines and standard practices followed by practitioners in the waiting environment as per the emergency care report (2020). Information system integrations have to consider the mandatory requirements. This is to ensure effective support of the entire process in initial health assessment, care, and treatment after admission. In addition, the information system has to provide clear communication protocols to all stakeholders in the emergency unit.

Staff productivity in the emergency care unit in reducing lengthy waits is determined by policies and systems applied in the provision of acute health care. This can be hugely influenced by patients’ perceptions of satisfaction after the implementation of the policies and systems (Unwin et al., 2016). Planning of realistic policies is imperative in incorporating communication protocols to emergency department workflow for reduced complications and complaints.

Reducing lengthy waits in the emergency department can lead to a reduction in healthcare problems. This entails reduced delays in treatment increasing illnesses and injuries. The length the patient waits plays as a driver towards patient satisfaction (Vashi et al., 2018). Information systems integration is reflected in emergency bed utilization and team communication for effectiveness and efficiency.

Article Credibility

The emergency care report’s credibility can be considered on the basis of observing set principles and guidelines in enabling safety and quality in emergency care. This is significant in articulating how patient waits can be impacted by manual documentation processes. A consideration of the NSW health policies and plans in preventing patient dissatisfaction also increases the article’s validity.

Urwin’s article credibility has been enabled through the close assessment of a sample population in a particular hospital. Through a cross-sectional survey and SPPS data analysis, information gathered was supported. Conclusive support of evidence from the research increases the study’s validity and its use.

The article on the application of lean principles by Vashi articulates the use of systems to reduce overcrowding and low quality in the emergency department. Its credibility has been enabled by the consideration of existing ED prioritized flow design and changes that can be made to increase efficiency. Further, the article widens the value stream scope of technology in emergency care.

Article Importance

The emergency care report (2020) will be imperative in increasing my understanding of how EDIS application can change procedures in ED. This will ensure that the proposed recommendation regards existing protocols, procedures, and policies from the health sector. An increased examination of designed and redesigned ED workflows will enhance the integration of information systems in emergency care (Vashi et al., 2018). A utilization of Urwin’s article will enable the identification and examination of patient perceptions on satisfaction from systems incorporation in the ED.

Conclusion

Combating lengthy waits in the emergency department can be imperative in increasing patient satisfaction. This can be influenced positively by the application of EDIS in the hospital unit. An evaluation of the articles has presented article credibility and significance in the research study. This will influence the utilization of EDIS in reducing emergency care waits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Emergency care report (2020). Emergency department patients waiting care. Retrieved from https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/manuals/Documents/pmm-6.pdf

Unwin M., Nurs, G., Kinsman, L, Rigby, S. & Nurs, G. (2016). Why are we waiting? Patients’ perspectives for accessing emergency department services with non-urgent complaints. International emergency nursing 29.

Vashi, A., Sheikhi, F., Nshton, L., Ellman, J., Rajagopal, P. & Asch, S. (2018). Applying lean principles to reduce wait times in the VA emergency department. Military medicine 184(1).

Assignment: Search and Evaluate Cultural And/Or Ethical Resources

Search and Evaluate

This week, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. Remember that next week you will submit a paper on Cultural and/or Ethical perspectives of inquiry, so use this week’s assignment to prepare materials and collect information for that purpose.

Use articles that will help you explain and describe cultural and/or ethical, legal or regulatory issues related to your topic. You will analyze and evaluate these articles in your submission, which should include:

  • A brief introductory paragraph
  • Three separate paragraphs, one for each of the three articles, each presenting:
    • A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article (use in-text citations)
    • An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Research Guides > Research Basics > Evaluating Resources)
    • An explanation of why the article will be useful in addressing your problem or issue
  • A brief conclusion paragraph
  • An APA Style reference list on a separate page

Your paper should be 1–3 pages in length (including the References page). Adhere to APA Style throughout.

Esophageal Reflux

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pagana: Mosby’s Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, 6th Edition

Esophageal Reflux

 

Case Studies

 

A 45-year-old woman complained of heartburn and frequent regurgitation of “sour” material into

her mouth. Often while sleeping, she would be awakened by a severe cough. The results of her

physical examination were negative.

 

Studies Results

Routine laboratory studies Negative

Barium swallow (BS), p. 941 Hiatal hernia

Esophageal function studies (EFS), p. 624

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES)

pressure

4 mm Hg (normal: 10–20 mm Hg)

Acid reflux Positive in all positions (normal: negative)

Acid clearing Cleared to pH 5 after 20 swallows (normal:

<10 swallows)

Swallowing waves Normal amplitude and normal progression

Bernstein test Positive for pain (normal: negative)

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), p. 547 Reddened, hyperemic, esophageal mucosa

Gastric scan, p. 743 Reflux of gastric contents to the lungs

Swallowing function, p. 1014 No aspiration during swallowing

 

Diagnostic Analysis

 

The barium swallow indicated a hiatal hernia. Although many patients with a hiatal hernia have

no reflux, this patient’s symptoms of reflux necessitated esophageal function studies. She was

found to have a hypotensive LES pressure along with severe acid reflux into her esophagus. The

abnormal acid clearing and the positive Bernstein test result indicated esophagitis caused by

severe reflux. The esophagitis was directly visualized during esophagoscopy. Her coughing and

shortness of breath at night were caused by aspiration of gastric contents while sleeping. This

was demonstrated by the gastric nuclear scan. When awake, she did not aspirate, as evident

during the swallowing function study. The patient was prescribed esomeprazole (Nexium). She

was told to avoid the use of tobacco and caffeine. Her diet was limited to small, frequent, bland

feedings. She was instructed to sleep with the head of her bed elevated at night. Because she had

only minimal relief of her symptoms after 6 weeks of medical management, she underwent a

laparoscopic surgical antireflux procedure. She had no further symptoms.

 

Critical Thinking Questions

 

1. Why would the patient be instructed to avoid tobacco and caffeine?

 

2. Why did the physician recommend 6 weeks of medical management?

 

 

Case Studies

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2

 

3. How do antacid medication work in patients with gastroesophageal reflux?

 

4. What would you approach the situation, if your patient decided not to take the medication

and asked you for an alternative medicine approach?

To write a scholarly paper on an informatics topic.

CWWSON NURS480 informatics scholarly paper

 

50% of Final Grade.

Purpose:

To write a scholarly paper on an informatics topic.

Student Learning Outcomes:

Achievement of assignment outcomes allow for achievement of course learning outcomes:

GCC:

1. Students will demonstrate context appropriate written, oral, and non-verbal communication skills.

3. Students will retrieve, analyze, synthesize information and solve problems using appropriate technology.

CO:

1. Integrate improvement methods to design and test changes that improve the quality and safety of healthcare. (Management of Care)

2. Justify the importance of variation and measurement in assessing quality of care. (Reduction of Risk Potential)

3. Consistently utilize patient technology, communication devices and information management to support safe processes of care. (Safety and Infection Control)

4. Effectively uphold ethical standards related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality and right to privacy. (Reduction of Risk)

5. Determine that redesign of workflow and care processes should precede implementation of care technology to facilitate nursing practice. (Management of Care)

6. Project future directions for patient care technology and information systems in health care. (Management of Care)

7. Analyze the impact of informatics in health care delivery and health care providers. (Physiological Adaptation)

 

DUE M 2/27 by 2359 for students in 460 Preceptorship Rotation 2 and students not in 460

DUE M 4/17 by 2359 for 460 Preceptorship Rotation 1

Directions:

1. Topics may be chosen from the list or obtain approval.

2. Clearly define and describe the topic.

3. The nurse or nursing student role must be clearly defined and elaborated.

4. Examine the effect of the chosen topic on health outcomes.

5. 3 page limit (maximum) excluding Title and References.

6. Identify which course objective(s) is being met by the paper. Note this in the text field when submitting the paper. 5 pts deducted for not listing objectives.

7. Follow the writing rubric in BB and APA 7th edition format (Title, headings, References, etc).

8. Reference minimum is 1.

9. Student must check box for Safe Assign when submitting.

10. Use of the CU Writing Center is encouraged!!

 

 

 

 

Topics for Paper-This project is to be completed by due dates listed on syllabus & above. You may select a different topic, if approved by Course Director.

1. Identification, resolution, and reporting of clinical errors by students

2. The user-perspective in technology implementation

3. Technologies most likely to improve patient safety

4. Individuals held accountable for system error flaws

5. Medical Identity Theft

6. What is Big Data and why is it relevant

7. Quality Improvement and Patient Outcomes

8. Best Practices in Downtime Documentation

9. Evaluating Nursing Care Quality

10. Management of Data errors on the EHR

11. Consequences of workarounds in health care.

12. Decision-support tools that reduce the caregiver’s workload

13. Decision-support tools and healthcare outcomes

14. Information technology in health care and effects on patient outcomes.

15. Relationship between informatics and reimbursement

16. Future of Nursing Informatics

17. Cybersecurity Issues

18. Role of Telehealth in nursing

19. Electronic Health Record Implementation in Rural Regions

20. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

21. Use of Clinical Guidelines

22. Use of informatics in healthcare promotion

23. Limitations of computerized clinical monitoring

24. Patient safety and the role of informatics

25. Do decision support tools impact on critical thinking

26. Informatics competencies for BSN

27. Sensitivity of personal health data and ethics

28. Identify challenges for the nurse with new technology

29. Reduction of risk and role of informatics

30. How does digital technology impact healthcare communication.

31. Health Information Safety and Security

32. Healthcare Literacy and Patient Outcomes

33. Technology and the effect on Health Behaviors

34. Nursing use of computerized clinical decision support system in practice

35. Data errors in the Electronic Health Record

 

Grading Rubric:

 

 

Purpose & FocusPoints:

14 (14.00%)

The purpose of the work is missing or very unclear. Key ideas are not developed. Conclusions are inaccurate and not supported by evidence.

Points:

16 (16.00%)

The purpose is not clearly defined and may be confusing to the reader. Evidence is present, but does not fully support the focus of the paper (3 paragraphs without cited evidence). Conclusions drawn may not flow from the body of the work.

Points:

18 (18.00%)

The purpose is clear in the title and introduction. The purpose is mostly supported with factual evidence throughout the paper (1-2 paragraphs without cited evidence). Accurate conclusions.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

The purpose is clear throughout the work. Creative title. Compelling. The focus is fully supported with factual evidence throughout the paper. Accurate conclusions.

Content/Subject KnowledgePoints:

21 (21.00%)

Student does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the subject matter. Minimal or no linkages between course content and practical examples or applications.

Points:

24 (24.00%)

Student demonstrates a general understanding of the subject matter (2 subjects underdeveloped). Minimal linkages between course content and practical examples or applications.

Points:

27 (27.00%)

Student exhibits and above average command of the subject matter (1 subject underdeveloped). Student is able to relate most course content to practical examples and applications.

Points:

30 (30.00%)

Student exhibits proficient command of the subject matter (topic described, RN role defined and elaborated, effect of outcomes described). Ideas fully developed. Student demonstrates ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications.

Organization & StructurePoints:

14 (14.00%)

Organization and structure detract from the message. Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. Too few sentences or too many. No logical flow of ideas.

Points:

16 (16.00%)

Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.

Points:

18 (18.00%)

Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. May have a few problems with clarity. Conclusion is logical.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.

APA 7th Ed FormatPoints:

(0.00%)

1 or more errors in APA format.

Points:

(0.00%)

Points:

(8.00%)

Length of assignment does not meet requirements.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Student is consistent in correct use of APA formatting. Formatting is free from errors. Student follows assignment instructions, including length of assignment.

Mechanics: Grammar, Punctuation & SpellingPoints:

(7.00%)

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language uses jargon or conversational tone.

Points:

(8.00%)

Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.

Points:

(9.00%)

Student demonstrates consistent rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling, with 1-3 errors.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Student demonstrates consistent correct us of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

Evidence/ReferencesPoints:

(7.00%)

Too few references. Evidence does not support ideas.

Points:

(8.00%)

Weak references or too few references that do not support ideas.

Points:

(9.00%)

Meets evidence requirements.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Use of strong, current evidence and meets or exceeds number of references required. Exemplary evidence woven into paper to support ideas.

Investigate the practice of nursing professionals on the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors.

SUMMARY

Introduction

Providing safe, effective, timely and individualized care is a major challenge in health care. Currently, the main errors in health care are related to medication errors. These errors can cause damage, especially in pediatrics, due to the immaturity of the organs and the variation in weight and body surface. In this way, the importance of nursing in this scenario for the guarantee of safe care is perceived.

Objective

Investigate the practice of nursing professionals on the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors.

Method

Descriptive, quantitative study conducted with 147 nursing professionals in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. For data collection, a questionnaire elaborated and based on the recommendations of the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular catheter-related infections related to the practice of medication administration was used and then descriptive analysis of the data was performed.

Results

The professionals pointed out weaknesses of the practice such as double checking of medications, administration of medications prepared by the partner, delays and lack of verification of prescriptions. The most common errors resulted from erroneous dosages and environmental factors were presented as critical points.

Conclusion

The findings interfere with the consolidation of safety practices in medication administration in pediatrics and neonatology, suggesting the need for equipment qualification and continuous monitoring of the work process.

Palavras-key: Medication errors; Security; Nursing

INTRODUCTION

Currently, one of the biggest challenges of health services is to provide safe, effective, timely and individualized care since, due to technological and scientific advances and the inclusion of increasingly complex techniques, the risks to patient safety have been enhanced. 1

The report To Err is Human Building a Safer Health System Institute of Medicine of the United States of America (USA), published in 2000, exposed epidemiological studies in which it was estimated that between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths were recorded in the country per year due to errors in medical care, cases of which 30% were related to medication errors. 2 In Brazil, the National System of Toxic-Pharmacological Information (Sintox) reveals that drugs are in first place among agents that cause poisoning in humans, and second among those that cause poisoning in general. 1 Also in Brazil, a major study conducted in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro demonstrated a 14.3% incidence of adverse events caused by drugs, 31.2% of which caused a serious health risk requiring life support. 3

A medication error is defined as an avoidable adverse event, temporary or permanent, that occurs at any stage of drug therapy and may or may not cause harm to the patient. The damage is determined to be an adverse event, which is considered an incident that results in harm to the patient’s health and affects recovery, extends the time and costs of hospitalization and leads to death. Medication errors can be classified as follows: error of prescription, distribution, by omission, by schedule, by the use of unauthorized drugs, of dose, presentation, preparation, administration, control or by the non-adherence of the patient or the family. 4

Estimates show that, among all hospitalized patients, approximately 3% develop an adverse event due to medication use. Although the frequency is similar between children and adults, the potential risk of harm is three times higher in paediatric and neonatal patients. 4.5 The increased risk in children is attributed to organ immaturity and their influence on drug metabolism, as well as variation in weight and body surface area. In association with this fact, we can add that many drugs used in pediatrics were designed for adults; Then, as a result of fractionation of doses, they can lead to errors in the preparation and administration process. 6.7

Several studies have confirmed that errors during drug administration can be avoided, which shows the important participation of the nursing team in the system to promote patient safety. 6 This fact is even more striking in terms of pediatric care, since a systematic review of medication errors in children has shown that the medication administration process exhibited a higher frequency of errors, among other findings, with a rate of 72% to 75% and, consequently, it is imperative that all institutions and health teams promote changes in organizational culture that allow analysis with a restructuring of processes and the creation of security strategies in order to reduce, to an acceptable minimum, the unnecessary risks and harms associated with care 8. In pediatric and neonatal intensive care units, the number of errors is 22 to 59 errors per thousand doses and approximately 2.5% of these children suffer drug-related adverse events. 4

In this context, the role of the nursing team stands out because, in addition to exercising a leadership role in the administration and control of pharmacological therapy, the complexity of pediatrics requires greater depth of knowledge and the commitment of the professional to carry out the process. However, despite the law of professional practices that proclaims that nurses must perform the most complex practices, in daily practice it has been observed that nurses, technicians and nurse assistants have similar attributions in pharmacological therapy. 5

The absence of quality in this process, with the consequent problems and adverse events, can be avoided with proactive and preventive interventions of hospital administration. Among these interventions, it is worth mentioning the nursing team in relation to knowledge about the drug administration process as an important factor in preventing medication errors, with a view to improving patient safety. 4.7

The first step to preventing errors that affect health is to admit that it is possible and, from this, that professionals understand the types of adverse events, their causes, consequences and factors that contribute to these adverse events. The reporting and recording of adverse events serve as elements for critical analysis and decision-making, processes that aim to eliminate, avoid and reduce these circumstances in daily medical care. 9

To support and improve this practice, it is necessary to know how the nursing team works in drug administration in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, as well as the circumstances in which errors occur. This research can offer subsidies to professionals to allow an extended analysis of the practice and the problems that permeate this process and, consequently, favor the design of actions that improve the quality of care and safety for all involved.

Therefore, this study aims to investigate the practice of nursing professionals in the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

METHOD

This is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, conducted with the nursing team of the neonatal and pediatric Intensive Care Units of an important hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.

Data were collected between August and November 2017, in morning, afternoon and evening shifts, on random days and contemplating six shifts per week. The study included all nurses, technicians and nurse assistants working in the respective units, so a sample of 147 professionals was reached. The following exclusion criteria were considered: professionals who were on vacation and on medical or maternity leave during the data collection period. A questionnaire was developed based on the recommendations of the Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Related to Intravascular Catheters 10 and was raised to the pre-trial phase with three specialist nurses, who indicated different suggestions for adjusting the instrument.

The instrument was divided into two parts: Part I was related to the characterization of the sociodemographic profile, where variables such as sex, age, time of exercise in the sector and profession, postgraduate training for nurses, working day and work shift, type of employment contract and participation in courses and conferences on the medication administration process were addressed. Part II included 14 questions that considered how often actions were initiated during the drug delivery process. Four alternatives were included for each action: always, sometimes, rarely or never; The participant had to indicate the correct option. In relation to the circumstance of the errors, 5 questions with various answers were included. These include questions about the types of errors, the circumstances that led to the errors, doubts in the medication process, actions related to the errors, and who to turn to in the event of an error.

The data were written without a spreadsheet in the Microsoft Excel 2010 program, with double typing. They were analyzed in the software StatisticalPackage for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19, using descriptive statistics with absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and measures of central trends (median) and dispersion for numerical variables.

The study respected the recommendations regarding privacy and confidentiality of Resolution No. 466, dated October 12, 2012, National Council for Scientific Research with Human Beings, and was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais and by the institution specialized in the field of study with the written opinion number 1,363,357 and CAAE number: 47994215.9.0000.5129. All research volunteers were pre-guided to the objectives and, after agreeing on them, participants signed the Free and Informed Consent Term (FICT) form on two counterparts.

RESULTS

The sample of this study was composed predominantly of nursing technicians between 25 and 68 years of age (median of 39 years), mostly women, with between 1 and 40 years of training (median of 12), who worked mainly in the Neonatal ICU, with a work regime of 12 hours per day/during the day and with a single and legally governed employment relationship.

Of the 24 nurses, two (8.3%) have a Master’s degree and 21 (87.5%) have a specialization. Among the professionals with specialization, 12 (57.1%) are related to pediatrics and neonatology, and nine (42.85%) to other areas. Table 1 shows the profiles of the professionals.

Table 1. Professional profile corresponding to the nursing team of neonatal and pediatric ICUs (N = 147). Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

Of the professionals who participated in the research, 51 (34.7%) indicated that they had participated in courses or conferences on the drug administration process between October 2016 and October 2017, while 94 (63.9%) stated that they had not done so during this period.

When asked if the nursing team had already made any mistakes in the medication preparation and administration process, 69 (46.9%) of the professionals answered yes, while 71 (48.3%) said no. Table 2 shows the descriptive analyses corresponding to the quantitative variables related to errors in drug preparation and administration.

Table 2. Frequency in relation to doubts and circumstances of errors when preparing and administering drugs. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

In relation to the conduct of professionals, when there was a delay in the administration schedule, 119 (81.0%) professionals said they administered the medication late, while 2 (1.4%) said they missed the schedule and 3 (2.0%) that they advanced the next administration. In addition, upon detecting an error in the medical prescription, 96 (65.3%) responded that they notified the nurse or the nursing coordination area, 90 (61.2%) notified the physician, and 1 (0.7%) participant stated that they tried to resolve it on their own. Table 3 shows the analyses related to the practice of professionals during the preparation and administration of drugs.

Table 3. Frequency of actions performed by professionals in the process of drug preparation and administration. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

DISCUSSION

The preparation and administration of drugs is a complex process in which nursing professionals have the important function of being the last barrier to avoid possible drug-related damages in the patient. Consequently, this study aimed to clarify that, through the analysis of the practice and circumstances of the errors, it is possible to propose more effective strategies to promote a culture of safety for the patient, by providing a more qualified and effective care.

Due to the unique nature and complexity of neonatology and pediatrics-oriented therapy, it is extremely important to deepen scientific knowledge and frequent training in such topics. 5 In opposition to this recommendation, this study noted that 63.9% of the study subjects indicated that they did not participate in courses or conferences on drug preparation and administration in the last year and that most have doubts regarding the action of the drugs, doubts that they resolve with their colleagues and not with the consulting nurse. Consequently, it is suggested that, to provide safe and quality care, it is necessary that work processes be reviewed based on scientific evidence and that professionals are trained and properly qualified, both leaders and those who carry out their orders. Educational strategies, mediated by focus groups or educational websites and didactic simulation games, have proven to be important interventions to reduce drug-related incident rates. 11.12

The main medication error mentioned by the professionals who participated in the study was that related to doses, which corroborates a study conducted in the United States with 120 patients in which it was shown that half of them were exposed to medication errors, and that most of the errors were linked to the dose. It should be noted that the main factor contributing to dose error in this study is the complexity and specificity of drug therapy in neonatology and pediatrics. 9,13 In the medical literature, there is evidence of a high prevalence of errors in medical prescription, more prevalent in drugs that want weight-based dosing and, therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific prescription instrument for pediatrics and neonatology, in addition to influencing the agreement of the measures taken when errors have been detected. 14

In relation to the reasons that contribute to medication error, environmental factors, such as poor lighting and inadequate physical conditions, constitute the highest percentage of the sample, followed by communication problems, which is corroborated by other studies. 15,16 It is verified that medication errors are due to the lack of preparation and knowledge of professionals, to the overload and stress generated in the work environment and to communication problems between the multidisciplinary team. It is also emphasized that it is common to suspend the administration of drugs and that the doctor who stopped it did not inform the nursing team. 15 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluated reports of fatal drug errors and found that 16% of the causes of such errors were attributed to communication problems. Consequently, prescribing is an important link in written communication between health professionals, and is seen as the beginning of a series of events within the medication process, which will lead to the safe administration of a dose to the patient. 17

Effective communication is another important factor in promoting patient safety in drug delivery, present in all interpersonal relationships, and is directly linked as a cause or contributing factor to most incidents. Adequate communication between professionals and patients and/or caregivers in relation to drug administration provided relevant and effective results, thus avoiding the occurrence of new incidents. 18

In relation to the incidence of errors, it is important to note that, from the recognition of an error, it is necessary to analyze the entire process and the components of the medication system, which can contribute or act as a barrier to overcome the error. These errors can be attributed to professionals, system failures, the institution or even the presentation of drugs. This analysis is indispensable to understand all the factors involved in the medication process, without attributing the failures to the incompetence or irresponsibility of employees. (1t)

In relation to the behavior of the professional in the face of error, most of the interviewees indicated that they notified the nursing coordination area, a fact that diverges from other studies. In a survey conducted in South Florida, it was found that 57.9% would not report an error if they thought it was not dangerous and 25% would not report it for fear of the consequences. The perception of the nursing staff regarding medication errors is that only 45.6% are reported; The rest is omitted for fear of reaction from leaders and colleagues. 19 The treatment given to error notifications with emphasis on staff performance contributes to the non-reporting of all errors, since professionals are afraid to respond to legal and administrative processes, to be labeled as negligent, to lose the trust of the administrator and his teams. It is a worrying reality that must be reversed because not reporting all errors prevents analyzing them and developing possible measures that minimize their frequency and guarantee patient safety.

Studies that problematize the cultural change in the approach to incidents related to patient safety have shown that an intervention specifically focused on this issue for professionals significantly reduces medication errors. In addition, political change in institutions is needed. 18

One of the main problems identified by the participants of this research was the interruption during the preparation of the drugs, which is included in the research as a critical point that leaves professionals more vulnerable to making a mistake, because they are exposed to distractions. In a study conducted with pediatric nurses, it was shown that the result was negative in 88.9% of the observed interruptions. Consequently, one study suggests that it is necessary to create restricted areas to prepare drugs, and thus avoid interference. 20

Double-checking is an effective method of eliminating errors in drug delivery. 15,16 In this study, the nursing team reported that this practice is scarce or practically nonexistent. In addition, there were cases where the drugs were administered by another person and cases where the drugs were not checked against the prescription before administration, which runs counter to good practice recommendations related to drug administration. 10

In this study, professionals reported that they follow some of the recommended actions in the safe drug delivery process. However, it should be considered that all practices involving patient safety in the health care process, and not just some, must be adhered to. Ensuring that good practices are adhered to prevents barriers from collapsing to prevent injuries. 10.16

The results presented are directly related to institutional specificities, a fact that limits generalization. Therefore, the relevance of studies with representative samples is highlighted, with the same theme as that of this study, resulting from the scarcity of studies with such design and focus in pediatrics and neonatology.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that the practice of drug preparation and administration has significant weaknesses that can jeopardize pediatric patient safety. Consequently, it is pointed out that it is necessary for the team to reflect on the findings so that behavioral changes and safety strategies can occur in order to avoid errors and, consequently, improve patient safety.

In view of the above, the relevance of such results is notorious. In this perspective, continuous team training with emphasis on the specifics of pediatrics and neonatology and the control and evaluation of process indicators are important strategies to avoid errors and adverse events. It is believed that, through these actions, the development and implementation of the safety culture is made possible.

 

image2.png

image3.png

image1.png

Test Bank Lewis s Medical Surgical Nursing 11 Edition Chapter 1 to 68 Questions and Answers!Rated A+ Answers

Test Bank Lewis s Medical Surgical Nursing 11 Edition Chapter 1 to 68 Questions and Answers!Rated A+ Answers

Table of Contents

Chapter 01: Professional Nursing

Chapter 02: Health Equity and Culturally Competent Care

Chapter 03: Health History and Physical Examination

Chapter 04: Patient and Caregiver Teaching

Chapter 05: Chronic Illness and Older Adults

Chapter 06: Stress Management

Chapter 07: Sleep and Sleep Disorders

Chapter 08: Pain

Chapter 09: Palliative and End of Life Care

Chapter 10: Substance Use Disorders

Chapter 11: Inflammation and Healing

Chapter 12: Genetics

Chapter 13: Immune Responses and Transplantation

Chapter 14: Infection

Chapter 15: Cancer

Chapter 16: Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Imbalances

Chapter 17: Preoperative Care

Chapter 18: Intraoperative Care

Chapter 19: Postoperative Care

Chapter 20: Assessment and Management: Visual Problems

Chapter 21: Assessment and Management: Auditory Problems

Chapter 22: Assessment: Integumentary System

Chapter 23: Integumentary Problems

Chapter 24: Burns

Chapter 25: Assessment: Respiratory System

Chapter 26: Upper Respiratory Problems

Chapter 27: Lower Respiratory Problems

Chapter 28: Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases

Chapter 29: Assessment: Hematologic System

Chapter 30: Hematologic Problems

Chapter 31: Assessment: Cardiovascular System

Chapter 32: Hypertension

Chapter 33: Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chapter 34: Heart Failure

Chapter 35: Dysrhythmias

Chapter 36: Inflammatory and Structural Heart Disorders

Chapter 37: Vascular Disorders

Chapter 38: Assessment: Gastrointestinal System

Chapter 39: Nutritional Problems

Chapter 40: Obesity

Chapter 41: Upper Gastrointestinal Problems

Chapter 42: Lower Gastrointestinal Problems

Chapter 43: Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas Problems

Chapter 44: Assessment: Urinary System

Chapter 45: Renal and Urologic Problems

Chapter 46: Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease

Chapter 47: Assessment: Endocrine System

Chapter 48: Diabetes Mellitus

Chapter 49: Endocrine Problems

Chapter 50: Assessment: Reproductive System

Chapter 51: Breast Disorders

Chapter 52: Sexually Transmitted Infections

Chapter 53: Female Reproductive Problems

Chapter 54: Male Reproductive Problems

Chapter 55: Assessment: Nervous System

Chapter 56: Acute Intracranial Problems

Chapter 57: Stroke

Chapter 58: Chronic Neurologic Problems

Chapter 59: Dementia and Delirium

Chapter 60: Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Problems

Chapter 61: Assessment: Musculoskeletal System

Chapter 62: Musculoskeletal Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery

Chapter 63: Musculoskeletal Problems

Chapter 64: Arthritis and Connective Tissue Diseases

Chapter 65: Critical Care

Chapter 66: Shock, Sepsis, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Chapter 67: Acute Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Chapter 68: Emergency and Disaster Nursing

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, before you can recommend potential pharmacotherapeutics to address a patient’s condition or disorder,

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, before you can recommend potential pharmacotherapeutics to address a patient’s condition or disorder, you must understand the basic function and structure of the neuron and central nervous system. For this Assignment, you will review and apply your understanding of neuroanatomy by addressing a set of short answer prompts. To Prepare: Review the Learning Resources for this week in preparation to complete this Assignment. Reflect on the basic function and structure of the neuron in relation to the central nervous system. Reflect on the inter-connectedness between neurons and the central nervous system, including the pathway and distribution of electrical impulses. Reflect on how neurons communicate with each other and review the concept of neuroplasticity. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Science Photo Libra To complete: Address the following Short Answer prompts for your Assignment. Be sure to include references to the Learning Resources for this week. In 4 or 5 sentences, describe the anatomy of the basic unit of the nervous system, the neuron. Include each part of the neuron and a general overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Be specific and provide examples. Answer the following (listing is acceptable for these questions): What are the major components that make up the subcortical structures? Which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction? What are the two key neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control? In 3 or 4 sentences, explain how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Be specific and provide examples.