Journal of Public Health Research

Journal of Public Health Research 2021; volume 10:2225

Exploring the relationship between nurses’ communication satisfaction and patient safety culture Linda Wieke Noviyanti, Ahsan Ahsan, Tita Sefti Sudartya School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract Background: Patient safety culture is associated with the val-

ues, attitudes, competencies and behaviors that support the safe conduct of individual or group activities in hospitals and other health organizations. Safety culture is influenced by various fac- tors, one of which is communication, which plays a significant role in health services. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the relationship between nurse communication satisfaction and the quality of patient safety culture in hospitals.

Design and Methods: This is a cross-sectional design with the proportional random sampling method used to data from 51 nurs- es, which was analyzed using the Spearman rank test. The major- ity of the nurses were female, between 20-30 years old, with 1-5 years working experience.

Results: The results showed a significant relationship between nurse communication satisfaction and the quality of patient safety culture. Furthermore, the higher the nurses’ level of communica- tion satisfaction, the better the applied quality of patient safety culture (r = 0.338).

Conclusions: Nurse communication satisfaction affects the provision of effective health care, with the ability to create good cooperative relationships and foster trust between professions in order to improve the quality of service delivery and patient safety.

Introduction Effective communication between nurses and doctors is a two-

way process that involves sending appropriate and understandable messages accepted and understood by others, thereby enabling a supportive working environment and patient safety.1 The Joint Commission stated that poor communication accounts for two- thirds of sentinel incidents in health care. Furthermore, inadequate communication between nurses and doctors leads to dissatisfac- tion and a lack of autonomy among nurses.2 Doctors are easily frustrated when orders are not placed on time, and communication vagueness also contributes to their job dissatisfaction.3 This tends to affect the quality of care and patient safety adversely. Donchin et al.4 stated that 37% of all health sectors’ errors are caused by the low communication quality between doctors and nurses in the

Intensive Care Unit. The authors further stated that some of these errors are preventable events. Communication satisfaction com- prises eight dimensions, namely the organization’s general per- spective, organizational integration, personal feedback, relation- ships with superiors, horizontal and informal communication, media quality, communication climate, and employee relations.4 The research results regarding the communication satisfaction of nurses in the Intensive Care Unit room found that women had lower scores on the dimensions of the general perspective of the organization and media quality.5 Nurses with master’s degrees scored lower on the dimensions of media quality and communica- tion climate compared to graduate and undergraduate graduates.6

An important factor affecting the quality of health care is applying a patient safety culture, with positive perceptions associ- ated with lower rates of adverse events.7 Patient safety is the act of avoiding, preventing or correcting a bad outcome or injury in the hospital treatment process. This area is important in health care due to the increase in adverse events that endanger patients’ lives.8,9 The 2013 Joint Commission International report stated that the adverse events associated with the health care industry in the United Kingdom and Australia were approximately 10% and 16.6%, respectively.10 Based on the types of incidents that occurred, near-miss was 47.6%, while the negative event was approximately 46.2%. The National Committee of patient safety recorded a total of 137 incidents from January 2010 to April 2011. Out of the measured 11 provinces in Indonesia, East Java had the highest number at 27%. Furthermore, out of the 137 patient safety incidents, adverse events, near miss, and other incidents were in percentages of 55.47%, 40.15% and 4.38%, respectively.11 There was an increase in the incidence of adverse events from 2007 to 2011, which prompted nurses and other health workers to reduce these incidents. Nurses play an essential role in improving patient safety because they are most often in direct contact with them.12

Therefore, hospital staff are used to determine and assess the level of patient safety in the hospital.

Patient safety culture comprises of seven sub-cultural factors, namely leadership, teamwork, evidence-based, communication, learning, accuracy, patient focus.13 Communication is a determin- ing factor in providing quality services in a hospital and plays an essential role in various areas of life. In an organization, commu- nication coordinates various activities to achieve set goals and develops an attitude of mutual understanding towards organiza-

Article

Significance for public health

Inadequate communication between nurses and other health workers causes sentinel incidents in health services. This also contributes to job dissatisfaction, which tends to affect the quality of care and patient safety. One of the important factors affecting the quality of health services is by applying a patient safety culture. For instance, positive perceptions were associated with a lower incidence of adverse events in patients. It is important to analyze the determinants of patient safety culture is applicable in all health care settings. Therefore, this study describes the relationship between nurse communication satisfaction and patient safety culture.

[Journal of Public Health Research 2021; 10:2225] [page 317]

 

 

tional members. Similarly, effective communication among health workers is a key feature of safe and reliable patient care.

Internal communication is an important factor in the successful achievement of organizational goals because it affects perform- ance, satisfaction and employee involvement. Similarly, effective communication between nurses and doctors positively affects the quality of patient outcomes such as satisfaction, short length of stay, and reduces adverse events.14-16

A preliminary study carried out in the inpatient room of Wava Husada Hospital stated that 57.4% of the patients were not satis- fied with communication in each team’s work unit. These patients were unhappy with the slow response to information delivery by some of the staff using WhatsApp. The team coordinator stated that sometimes staff fail to carry out orders immediately because they were still working on other jobs. Sometimes, after completing these jobs, they forget to carry out the previously assigned orders. Interviews with nursing staff found that 4 out of 5 or 80% expressed dissatisfaction with communication, especially in terms of openness with supervisor and limitations in conveying ideas and opinions. Therefore, this study examines the relationship between communication satisfaction and patient safety culture.

Design and Methods This is a cross-sectional research with the non-experimental

design process used to identify the relationship between communi- cation satisfaction and safety culture. The proportional random sampling method was used to obtain data from nurses employed at four medical/surgical units in a hospital located in the Malang region and 248-beds in March 2019. The units were selected based on a set of criteria, which included those that have worked in an inpatient unit for at least 2 months, performed nursing care directly to patients, and those that work more than 7.5 hours per week. Furthermore, data were obtained using the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), which was tested for reliability with a value of r=0.990 and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture by AHRQ to measure safety culture. In addition, the Spearman Rank statistical test and SPSS for Windows version 16 statistical analysis were used to determine the correlation between the two variables with a significance limit of p<0.05.

Results and Discussions Table 1 shows that out of the total number of nurses used in the

research, 42 (82.4%) aged 20-30 years. Based on gender, the char- acteristics of respondents showed that 76.5% (39 nurses) were female. Meanwhile, the number of those that worked in hospitals for 1-5 years is 26 (51.0%). Table 2 shows the distribution frequen- cy of patient safety culture. The Spearman rank correlation statis- tical test results also indicated a significant relationship between nurse communication satisfaction and the quality of patient safety culture. Therefore, the higher the level of nurse’s communication satisfaction, the better the patient safety culture (p=0.015; α=0.05; r=0.338).

The satisfaction research on communication carried out on 51 nurses showed that most were in the high category. In the question- naire item regarding communication satisfaction, “the extent to which my supervisor listens and pays attention to me” and “the dis- closure of financial status by superiors” had the highest and lowest values, respectively. This is in accordance with the dimensions of

communication satisfaction, known as openness, which tends to affect the environment when not properly fulfilled. However, it is inversely proportional to another study whereby 110 respondents (70.5%) based on supervision and direction stated that nurse organizations’ communication satisfaction in hospital inpatient rooms shows that organizational communication satisfaction is weak.17 The result showed that this occurs when the communicator has less experience and knowledge in conveying messages.

The highest communication satisfaction is shown at the age of 20-30 years because the majority of respondents come from that age. Furthermore, age is also related to the length of work in the hospital. This is in accordance with another finding which stated that job satisfaction is influenced by communication satisfaction in an organization, which continues to increase in more professional staff along with rise in age.18 The length of time a person has worked in a hospital and certain units indicates their ability to pos- sess more experience working as nurses. Experience influences communication satisfaction, which supports the quality of speech. Therefore, people with good knowledge need adequate communi- cation qualities to increase the enthusiasm of the interlocutor and enable them to understand the information provided. Therefore, good coordination has the ability to increase communication satis- faction among nurses and other health workers.19

Nurses need proper communication to carry out activities and achieve set goals in the care unit. When the communication sources are sufficient, job-related information’s availability and adequacy enable nurses to feel satisfied. Communication satisfac-

Article

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of respondents.

Characteristics n %

Age 20-30 years 42 82.4 >30 years 9 17.6 Sex Male 12 23.6 Female 39 76.5 Hospital units Inpatient 34 66.7 Intensive care 11 21.6 Hemodialysis 6 11.7 Length of work <1 year 4 7.8 1-5 years 26 51.0 6-10 years 18 35.3 11-15 years 3 5.9

Table 2. Frequency distribution on perceptions of patient safety culture.

Characteristics % positive response rate

Expectations and activities of supervisors / 65.19 managers that support Safety Organizational learning – continuous improvement 96.73 Teamwork in the hospital unit 81.86 Openness of communication 62.74 Feedback and communication about error 83.01 Response not punish to error 40.52 Staffing 41.18 Hospital management support for patient safety 68.63

[page 318] [Journal of Public Health Research 2021; 10:2225]

 

 

tion refers to the extent to which nurses feel satisfied with the information provided in their environment.6 The existing literature shows that when employees are satisfied with their communication rate, effective working relationships are established between supervisors, subordinates and peers. The research results on the quality of patient safety culture carried out on 51 nurses showed that the majority had a good quality of safety culture. In the ques- tionnaire for the quality of patient safety culture, the highest score was on the item “our unit works together as a team to complete a job” this is shown by good coordination between team members in the unit when receiving patients and when communicating with doctors regarding the patient’s condition. While the lowest score on the item was “Our unit has enough staff to handle the excessive workload”, therefore this item has a major effect on the quality of patient safety culture that is not good. This is in accordance with the research carried out by Pujilestari et al. at the inpatient instal- lation center. The research showed that out of a total of 75 nurses, 38 (50.7%) had a good safety culture quality, while 37 (49.3%) were in the poor category.20 This is evidenced by the high level of awareness of nurses in ensuring patient safety. This study shows that the longer a person works in a certain unit, the better the patient safety culture’s quality. Therefore, the length of work is directly related to nurses’ performance because the longer a person works, the higher the productivity. Hence it can be concluded that nurses with longer work experience in a unit are able to implement a safety culture properly.21

In addition, there is a significant relationship between nurse communication satisfaction and the quality of patient safety cul- ture. The higher the level of nurses’ communication satisfaction, the more significant the quality of the patient safety culture that is implemented. This study’s results are in accordance with the state- ments that safety culture is enhanced through programs, such as unit-based interventions, the participation of organizational leader- ship in setting patient safety as a priority, education in hospitals, increasing collaboration between disciplines and increasing open- ness of communication within and between units.19,22,23

Organizational climate is influenced by the way members behave and communicate. When the organizational climate in an organization is built positively or well developed, it increases pos- itive behavior or attitudes, job satisfaction, and communication satisfaction among members.23,24 An open communication climate is needed in hospital services because it is multidisciplinary and has the potential for conflict due to efficiency. In health care, 70- 80% of the errors that occur are caused by poor communication and understanding within the team. Therefore, teamwork helps to reduce the problem of patient safety. Furthermore, interprofession- al collaboration is needed to enhance the quality of outcomes in health service delivery. Collaborative communication is an impor- tant factor in nursing care, capable of improving patient safety.22

The American Nurses Association stated that effective communi- cation is used as a standard for professional nursing practice. Most nurses’ communication satisfaction is good due to their freedom to express their opinions on ideas and input to other health workers. A good work environment can increase nurses’ confidence in expressing opinions, thereby raising their ability to apply a positive attitude towards implementing patient safety procedures.25

The role of managers in determining the level of satisfaction of staff communication is very large. Managers have interpersonal roles that lead to achieving organizational goals, which is signifi- cantly dependent on their communication method. The nursing unit manager shows learning through supervision, encouragement or motivation, and the provision of information to improve staff work abilities and increase the nursing unit team’s effectiveness through the communication process.23 When the nursing unit team’s effec-

tiveness increases, their performance in implementing a patient safe- ty culture rises, thereby maximizing the services provided. The man- ager role in evaluating structured work shifts provides open commu- nication opportunities for the health team. It simultaneously fosters a collaborative work environment and a positive atmosphere for staff regarding freedom of speech regarding emotional events, teamwork, roles and organizational aspects predetermined model. This can help team members increase their understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Also, it can be used to solve collaborative problems among teams, thereby increasing communication. Nurses need to implement effective professional communication because it is relat- ed to the provision of effective health.26 Effective, responsible and respectful communication between nurses, doctors and other health workers enhances cooperative relations and increases trusting rela- tionships between related professions.2 Effective communication is needed in a nursing unit in a hospital to improve service quality and patient safety.

Conclusions In conclusion, the majority of nurses’ communication satisfac-

tion in health care centers is high. However, hospitals need to implement effective communication between units and individual nurses, managers and other health workers to achieve professional services. This acts as the basis for the organization to build a safety culture that starts with communication.

[Journal of Public Health Research 2021; 10:2225] [page 319]

Article

Correspondence: Linda Wieke Noviyanti, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Jl. Puncak Dieng, Kunci, Kalisongo, Kec. Dau, Malang, East Java 65151, Indonesia. Tel.+62.341569117 – Fax: +62.341564755. E-mail: linda.wieke@ub.ac.id

Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to all those that con- tributed to this research, particularly students of the bachelor program in School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

Key words: Patient safety culture; communication satisfaction; nurses.

Contribution: All authors contributed equally to this article. LWN served as a supervisor in verifying the method and design of the study; TSS carried out the research, performed the statistical analysis and interpretation of data. Furthermore, all authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Funding: This work was supported by the Nursing Department Grant, funded by the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia (No: 91A/UN10.F08.12/KS/2018),

Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Commission of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia (ethical clearance letter no. 186/EC/KEPK/ 06/2019).

Conference presentation: Part of this study was presented at the 1st

International Nursing and Health Sciences Symposium, November 13th to 15th 2020, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.

Received for publication: 16 January 2021. Accepted for publication: 15 March 2021.

©Copyright: the Author(s), 2021 Licensee PAGEPress, Italy Journal of Public Health Research 2021;10:2225 doi:10.4081/jphr.2021.2225

 

 

[page 320] [Journal of Public Health Research 2021; 10:2225]

References 1. Brady AM, Byrne G, Quirke MB, et al. Barriers to effective,

safe communication and workflow between nurses and non- consultant hospital doctors during out-of-hours. Int J Qual Heal Care 2017;29:929–34.

2. Wang YY, Wan QQ, Lin F, et al. Interventions to improve com- munication between nurses and physicians in the intensive care unit: An integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Sci 2018;5:81– 8.

3. Rosenstein AH. Nurse-physician relationships: Impact on nurse satisfaction and retention. Am J Nurs 2002;102:26–34.

4. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995;23:294-300.

5. Down CW, Hazen MD. A factor analytic study of communica- tion satisfaction. J Bus Commun 1990;14:63–73.

6. Vermeir P, Blot S, Degroote SV, et al. Communication satisfac- tion and job satisfaction among critical care nurses and their impact on burnout and intention to leave: A questionnaire study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2018;48:21–7.

7. Huang CH, Wu HH, Lee YC. The perceptions of patient safety culture: A difference between physicians and nurses in Taiwan. Appl Nurs Res 2018;40:39–44.

8. Soop M, Fryksmark U, Köster M, et al. The incidence of adverse events in Swedish hospitals: A retrospective medical record review study. Int J Qual Heal Care 2009;21:285–91.

9. Vlayen A, Hellings J, Claes N, et al. A nationwide hospital sur- vey on patient safety culture in Belgian hospitals: Setting pri- orities at the launch of a 5-year patient safety plan. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:760–7.

10. Irawan A, Yulia S, Mulyadi M. [Hubungan Supervisi Dengan Penerapan Budaya Keselamatan Pasien Di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit XX (The relationship between supervision and the implementation of patient safety culture in inpatient rooms at XX hospital)].[Article in Indonesian]. Maskermedika 2018;5:241-54.

11. Hospital Patient Safety Committee. [Patient safety incident report].[in Indonesian]. Jakarta; Hospital Patient Safety Committee; 2011.

12. Maeda S, Kamishiraki E, Starkey J. Patient safety education at Japanese medical schools: Results of a nationwide survey. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:226.

13. Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, et al. What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010;42:156–65.

14. Larrabee JH, Ostrow CL, Withrow ML, et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction with inpatient hospital nursing care. Res

Nurs Heal 2004;27:254–68. 15. Tschannen D, Kalisch BJ. The impact of nurse/physician col-

laboration on patient length of stay. J Nurs Manag 2009;17:796–803.

16. Riga M, Vozikis A, Pollalis Y, et al. MERIS (Medical Error Reporting Information System) as an innovative patient safety intervention: A health policy perspective. Health Policy (New York) 2015;119:539–48.

17. Rudianti Y, Handiyani H, Sabri L. [Peningkatan Kinerja Perawat Pelaksana Melalui Komunikasi Organisasi di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit (Improving the performance of implementing nurses through organizational communication in hospital inpatient rooms)].[Article in Indonesian]. J Keperawatan Indones 2013;16:25–32.

18. Doo EY, Kim M. Effects of hospital nurses’ internalized dom- inant values, organizational silence, horizontal violence, and organizational communication on patient safety. Res Nurs Heal 2020;43:499–510.

19. Yoo J, Chung SE, Oh J. Safety climate and organizational com- munication satisfaction among Korean perianesthesia care unit nurses. J Perianesthesia Nurs 2021;36:24-29.

20. Pujilestari A, Maidin A, Anggraeni R. [Budaya Keselamatan Pasien di Instalasi Rawat Inap RSUP Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Kota Makassar (Patient safety culture in Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo hospital, Makassar City].[Article in Indonesian]. J MKMI 2014;10:57–64.

21. Kim SH, Weng SJ. Incorporating work experience of medical staff into patient safety climate management: A multi-group analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:919.

22. Liu W, Gerdtz M, Manias E. Creating opportunities for inter- disciplinary collaboration and patient-centred care: how nurs- es, doctors, pharmacists and patients use communication strategies when managing medications in an acute hospital set- ting. J Clin Nurs 2016;25:2943–57.

23. Silla I, Navajas J, Koves GK. Organizational culture and a safety-conscious work environment: The mediating role of employee communication satisfaction. J Safety Res 2017;61:121–7.

24. Kim Y, Jang SJ. Nurses’ organizational communication satis- faction, emotional labor, and prosocial service behavior: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci 2019;21:223–30.

25. Doo EY, Choi S. Effects of horizontal violence among nurses on patient safety: Mediation of organisational communication satisfaction and moderated mediation of organisational silence. J Nurs Manag 2020. Online ahead of print.

26. Norouzinia R, Aghabarari M, Shiri M, et al. Communication barriers perceived by nurses and patients. Glob J Health Sci 2015;8:65–74.

Article

 

 

Copyright of Journal of Public Health Research is the property of PAGEPress and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Assignment – Social Media in Healthcare

Module 04 Assignment – Social Media in Healthcare

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Module 04 Content

1.

Top of Form

Develop a 5-6 slide PowerPoint presentation that covers the ethical implications of social media in healthcare. Be sure to address email communication, texting, and Facebook (at a minimum) and provide the “pros/cons” of using each in healthcare (from the perspective of the healthcare provider).

 

Submit your completed assignment to the drop box below. Please check the   Course Calendar for specific due dates.

 

Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.pptx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504

Bottom of Form

Healthcare facilities have grown in many cases to multiple campuses or affiliations with other systems which may include one or more  teaching hospitals outside your geographic area).

Healthcare facilities have grown in many cases to multiple campuses or affiliations with other systems which may include one or more  teaching hospitals outside your geographic area). As this trend continues, marketing efforts increase. Answer both questions below.

  1. Has this trend occurred in your institution or geographic area?
  2. What effect has this trend had on patient census in your (or nearby) healthcare settings?

Discuss how use of electronic health records (EHR) is affecting the quality of patient documentation and positive patient outcomes.

Discuss how use of electronic health records (EHR) is affecting the quality of patient documentation and positive patient outcomes. Review the Standards of Patient Safety for 2019, and identify two or three of the standards that need to be implemented on your nursing unit/setting with rationale. What would you expect in regard to patient outcomes after implementation of the selected standards?

Concisely summarize your discussion.

Expectations

  • Length: 1-2 pages, excluding title and reference pages
  • Format: APA 6th ed., required
  • Research: Cite at least three (3) credible, peer-reviewed references from the past five years.

Discuss the four key concepts of patient safety and how you, as a nurse leader, can ensure implementation in a healthcare setting.

Discuss the four key concepts of patient safety and how you, as a nurse leader, can ensure implementation in a healthcare setting.

150-250 words and use a source

There is a one in a million chance of a person being harmed while travelling by plane.

There is a one in a million chance of a person being harmed while travelling by plane. In comparison, there is a one in 300 chance of a patient being harmed while receiving health care. One estimate is a cost of nine billion dollars annually.

  • What is the most frequent patient incident on your unit and how have nursing leaders intervened to decrease the number of incidents?
  • How much interaction is there between your healthcare organization and nursing leaders and the nursing staff about the nurses’ role in patient safety?

I work med surge/ tele unit

National Association for Healthcare Quality: Certification (CPHQ)

Based on your readings, describe the role of these agencies in healthcare. Discuss one of the quality programs that you, as a future nurse leader,  would like to incorporate into your practice setting. Discuss the rationale for your choice.

Expectations

  • Length: 1-2 pages, excluding title and reference pages
  • Format: APA 6th ed., required

What role do staff nurses play in patient safety?

What role do staff nurses play in patient safety?

How would you, as a nurse leader, create a culture of safety for patients and staff?

 Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions with at least 500 words. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions with at least 500 words. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed with references within the last 5 years published. No plagiarism please.

CASE STUDY: Active Labor: Susan Wong Mrs. Wong, a first-time mother, is admitted to the birthing suite in early labor after spontaneous rupture of membranes at home. She is at 38 weeks of gestation with a history of abnormal alpha-fetoprotein levels at 16 weeks of pregnancy. She was scheduled for ultrasonography to visualize the fetus to rule out an open spinal defect or Down syndrome, but never followed through. Mrs. Wong and her husband disagreed about what to do (keep or terminate the pregnancy) if the ultrasonography indicated a spinal problem, so they felt they did not want this information.

Reflective Questions

1. As the nurse, what priority data would you collect from this couple to help define relevant interventions to meet their needs?

2. How can you help this couple if they experience a negative outcome in the birthing suite? What are your personal views on terminating or continuing a pregnancy with a risk of a potential anomaly? What factors may influence your views?

3. With the influence of the recent Human Genome Project and the possibility of predicting open spinal defects earlier in pregnancy, how will maternity care change in the future?

Module_Five_Project_Preparation_Guidelines_and_Rubric.html

IHP_501_Module_Five_Project_Preparation_Guidelines_and_Rubric.html

 

Overview

Excellent work! Now that you have successfully conducted a mini ethnographic analysis of the population, you will focus on other related health challenges. Even though the primary health challenge for your chosen humanitarian aid trip will be the focus of your interventions, there are other real and potential health challenges the population or the team will encounter. If you want to be successful on this trip, you need to know about these other health challenges and how they interact with the primary health challenge.

By investigating the scholarly literature, you will answer the questions: What is known about the other health challenges among the population within the area of focus for the humanitarian aid trip? What should the team prepare to encounter?

Prompt

Building on the prior project preparation assignments, examine the details related to the other health challenges faced by the population, as well as those your team may meet, during the humanitarian aid trip. Craft a short paper to further your analysis of the nature of the other health challenges. Search the scholarly literature to support your analysis for at least three different health challenges for your chosen location. Your responses should be concise.

Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.

You must identify three other health challenges and address all the following specified criteria for each of these other health challenges:

  1. Other Health Challenge #1: Assess the implications and interactions of this health challenge with your selected health challenge for your aid trip.
    1. Analysis: Analyze the other health challenge. Be sure to address the following aspects:
      • Incidence: Identify the incidence related to the health challenge.
      • Prevalence: Describe the prevalence of the health challenge.
      • Presentation: Explain the clinical symptoms or noted characteristics of the health challenge.
      • Influence of social determinants: Describe the influence of the social determinants related to the health challenge.
      • Inequities: Identify any inequities related to the location of the humanitarian aid trip.
      • Related programs, policies, or legislation: Identify any programs, policies, or legislation related to the health challenge.
      • Other characteristics or facts: Describe other characteristics or facts related to this health challenge.
    2. Connections: Draw connections to your chosen health challenge for your humanitarian aid trip in the Connections section. How does this challenge impact the population and the health challenge of focus? Explain what the team should expect in relation to this challenge. In other words, what should the team be ready to address regarding this challenge?
  2. Other Health Challenge #2: Assess the implications and interactions of this health challenge with your selected health challenge for your aid trip.
  1. Analysis: Analyze the other health challenge. Be sure to address the following aspects:
    • Incidence: Identify the incidence related to the health challenge.
    • Prevalence: Describe the prevalence of the health challenge.
    • Presentation: Explain the clinical symptoms or noted characteristics of the health challenge.
    • Influence of social determinants: Describe the influence of the social determinants related to the health challenge.
    • Inequities: Identify any inequities related to the location of the humanitarian aid trip.
    • Related programs, policies, or legislation: Identify any programs, policies, or legislation related to the health challenge.
    • Other characteristics or facts: Describe other characteristics or facts related to this health challenge.
  2. Connections: Draw connections to your chosen health challenge for your humanitarian aid trip in the Connections section. How does this challenge impact the population and the health challenge of focus? Explain what the team should expect in relation to this challenge. In other words, what should the team be ready to address regarding this challenge?
  • Other Health Challenge #3: Assess the implications and interactions of this health challenge with your selected health challenge for your aid trip.
    1. Analysis: Analyze the other health challenge. Be sure to address the following aspects:
      • Incidence: Identify the incidence related to the health challenge.
      • Prevalence: Describe the prevalence of the health challenge.
      • Presentation: Explain the clinical symptoms or noted characteristics of the health challenge.
      • Influence of social determinants: Describe the influence of the social determinants related to the health challenge.
      • Inequities: Identify any inequities related to the location of the humanitarian aid trip.
      • Related programs, policies, or legislation: Identify any programs, policies, or legislation related to the health challenge.
      • Other characteristics or facts: Describe other characteristics or facts related to this health challenge.
    2. Connections: Draw connections to your chosen health challenge for your humanitarian aid trip in the Connections section. How does this challenge impact the population and the health challenge of focus? Explain what the team should expect in relation to this challenge. In other words, what should the team be ready to address regarding this challenge?

Guidelines for Submission

Your short paper must be a 2- to 3-page Word document, not including the title page and references. It must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references must be cited in APA format.

CriteriaExemplary (100%)Proficient (90%)Needs Improvement (70%)Not Evident (0%)Value
Other Health Challenge #1: AnalysisExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageAnalyzes the other health challenge by comprehensively addressing all the listed elementsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15
Other Health Challenge #1: ConnectionsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDraws connections to the chosen health challenge by addressing how the challenge interacts with the population and the health challenge of focus, and explains what the team should expect in this challengeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10
Other Health Challenge #2: AnalysisExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageAnalyzes the other health challenge by comprehensively addressing all the listed elementsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15
Other Health Challenge #2: ConnectionsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDraws connections to the chosen health challenge by addressing how the challenge interacts with the population and the health challenge of focus, and explains what the team should expect in this challengeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10
Other Health Challenge #3: AnalysisExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageAnalyzes the other health challenge by comprehensively addressing all the listed elementsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15
Other Health Challenge #3: ConnectionsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDraws connections to the chosen health challenge by addressing how the challenge interacts with the population and the health challenge of focus, and explains what the team should expect in this challengeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10
Articulation of ResponseExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful mannerClearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purposeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas10
Scholarly SourcesIncorporates more than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightfulIncorporates three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claimsIncorporates fewer than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources10
APA StyleFormats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errorsFormats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errorsFormats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errorsDoes not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style5
Total:100%

Module Five Project Preparation Rubric