Assignment: Search and Evaluate Cultural And/Or Ethical Resources

Search and Evaluate

This week, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. Remember that next week you will submit a paper on Cultural and/or Ethical perspectives of inquiry, so use this week’s assignment to prepare materials and collect information for that purpose.

Use articles that will help you explain and describe cultural and/or ethical, legal or regulatory issues related to your topic. You will analyze and evaluate these articles in your submission, which should include:

  • A brief introductory paragraph
  • Three separate paragraphs, one for each of the three articles, each presenting:
    • A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article (use in-text citations)
    • An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Research Guides > Research Basics > Evaluating Resources)
    • An explanation of why the article will be useful in addressing your problem or issue
  • A brief conclusion paragraph
  • An APA Style reference list on a separate page

Your paper should be 1–3 pages in length (including the References page). Adhere to APA Style throughout.

Esophageal Reflux

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pagana: Mosby’s Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, 6th Edition

Esophageal Reflux

 

Case Studies

 

A 45-year-old woman complained of heartburn and frequent regurgitation of “sour” material into

her mouth. Often while sleeping, she would be awakened by a severe cough. The results of her

physical examination were negative.

 

Studies Results

Routine laboratory studies Negative

Barium swallow (BS), p. 941 Hiatal hernia

Esophageal function studies (EFS), p. 624

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES)

pressure

4 mm Hg (normal: 10–20 mm Hg)

Acid reflux Positive in all positions (normal: negative)

Acid clearing Cleared to pH 5 after 20 swallows (normal:

<10 swallows)

Swallowing waves Normal amplitude and normal progression

Bernstein test Positive for pain (normal: negative)

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), p. 547 Reddened, hyperemic, esophageal mucosa

Gastric scan, p. 743 Reflux of gastric contents to the lungs

Swallowing function, p. 1014 No aspiration during swallowing

 

Diagnostic Analysis

 

The barium swallow indicated a hiatal hernia. Although many patients with a hiatal hernia have

no reflux, this patient’s symptoms of reflux necessitated esophageal function studies. She was

found to have a hypotensive LES pressure along with severe acid reflux into her esophagus. The

abnormal acid clearing and the positive Bernstein test result indicated esophagitis caused by

severe reflux. The esophagitis was directly visualized during esophagoscopy. Her coughing and

shortness of breath at night were caused by aspiration of gastric contents while sleeping. This

was demonstrated by the gastric nuclear scan. When awake, she did not aspirate, as evident

during the swallowing function study. The patient was prescribed esomeprazole (Nexium). She

was told to avoid the use of tobacco and caffeine. Her diet was limited to small, frequent, bland

feedings. She was instructed to sleep with the head of her bed elevated at night. Because she had

only minimal relief of her symptoms after 6 weeks of medical management, she underwent a

laparoscopic surgical antireflux procedure. She had no further symptoms.

 

Critical Thinking Questions

 

1. Why would the patient be instructed to avoid tobacco and caffeine?

 

2. Why did the physician recommend 6 weeks of medical management?

 

 

Case Studies

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2

 

3. How do antacid medication work in patients with gastroesophageal reflux?

 

4. What would you approach the situation, if your patient decided not to take the medication

and asked you for an alternative medicine approach?

To write a scholarly paper on an informatics topic.

CWWSON NURS480 informatics scholarly paper

 

50% of Final Grade.

Purpose:

To write a scholarly paper on an informatics topic.

Student Learning Outcomes:

Achievement of assignment outcomes allow for achievement of course learning outcomes:

GCC:

1. Students will demonstrate context appropriate written, oral, and non-verbal communication skills.

3. Students will retrieve, analyze, synthesize information and solve problems using appropriate technology.

CO:

1. Integrate improvement methods to design and test changes that improve the quality and safety of healthcare. (Management of Care)

2. Justify the importance of variation and measurement in assessing quality of care. (Reduction of Risk Potential)

3. Consistently utilize patient technology, communication devices and information management to support safe processes of care. (Safety and Infection Control)

4. Effectively uphold ethical standards related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality and right to privacy. (Reduction of Risk)

5. Determine that redesign of workflow and care processes should precede implementation of care technology to facilitate nursing practice. (Management of Care)

6. Project future directions for patient care technology and information systems in health care. (Management of Care)

7. Analyze the impact of informatics in health care delivery and health care providers. (Physiological Adaptation)

 

DUE M 2/27 by 2359 for students in 460 Preceptorship Rotation 2 and students not in 460

DUE M 4/17 by 2359 for 460 Preceptorship Rotation 1

Directions:

1. Topics may be chosen from the list or obtain approval.

2. Clearly define and describe the topic.

3. The nurse or nursing student role must be clearly defined and elaborated.

4. Examine the effect of the chosen topic on health outcomes.

5. 3 page limit (maximum) excluding Title and References.

6. Identify which course objective(s) is being met by the paper. Note this in the text field when submitting the paper. 5 pts deducted for not listing objectives.

7. Follow the writing rubric in BB and APA 7th edition format (Title, headings, References, etc).

8. Reference minimum is 1.

9. Student must check box for Safe Assign when submitting.

10. Use of the CU Writing Center is encouraged!!

 

 

 

 

Topics for Paper-This project is to be completed by due dates listed on syllabus & above. You may select a different topic, if approved by Course Director.

1. Identification, resolution, and reporting of clinical errors by students

2. The user-perspective in technology implementation

3. Technologies most likely to improve patient safety

4. Individuals held accountable for system error flaws

5. Medical Identity Theft

6. What is Big Data and why is it relevant

7. Quality Improvement and Patient Outcomes

8. Best Practices in Downtime Documentation

9. Evaluating Nursing Care Quality

10. Management of Data errors on the EHR

11. Consequences of workarounds in health care.

12. Decision-support tools that reduce the caregiver’s workload

13. Decision-support tools and healthcare outcomes

14. Information technology in health care and effects on patient outcomes.

15. Relationship between informatics and reimbursement

16. Future of Nursing Informatics

17. Cybersecurity Issues

18. Role of Telehealth in nursing

19. Electronic Health Record Implementation in Rural Regions

20. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

21. Use of Clinical Guidelines

22. Use of informatics in healthcare promotion

23. Limitations of computerized clinical monitoring

24. Patient safety and the role of informatics

25. Do decision support tools impact on critical thinking

26. Informatics competencies for BSN

27. Sensitivity of personal health data and ethics

28. Identify challenges for the nurse with new technology

29. Reduction of risk and role of informatics

30. How does digital technology impact healthcare communication.

31. Health Information Safety and Security

32. Healthcare Literacy and Patient Outcomes

33. Technology and the effect on Health Behaviors

34. Nursing use of computerized clinical decision support system in practice

35. Data errors in the Electronic Health Record

 

Grading Rubric:

 

 

Purpose & FocusPoints:

14 (14.00%)

The purpose of the work is missing or very unclear. Key ideas are not developed. Conclusions are inaccurate and not supported by evidence.

Points:

16 (16.00%)

The purpose is not clearly defined and may be confusing to the reader. Evidence is present, but does not fully support the focus of the paper (3 paragraphs without cited evidence). Conclusions drawn may not flow from the body of the work.

Points:

18 (18.00%)

The purpose is clear in the title and introduction. The purpose is mostly supported with factual evidence throughout the paper (1-2 paragraphs without cited evidence). Accurate conclusions.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

The purpose is clear throughout the work. Creative title. Compelling. The focus is fully supported with factual evidence throughout the paper. Accurate conclusions.

Content/Subject KnowledgePoints:

21 (21.00%)

Student does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the subject matter. Minimal or no linkages between course content and practical examples or applications.

Points:

24 (24.00%)

Student demonstrates a general understanding of the subject matter (2 subjects underdeveloped). Minimal linkages between course content and practical examples or applications.

Points:

27 (27.00%)

Student exhibits and above average command of the subject matter (1 subject underdeveloped). Student is able to relate most course content to practical examples and applications.

Points:

30 (30.00%)

Student exhibits proficient command of the subject matter (topic described, RN role defined and elaborated, effect of outcomes described). Ideas fully developed. Student demonstrates ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications.

Organization & StructurePoints:

14 (14.00%)

Organization and structure detract from the message. Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. Too few sentences or too many. No logical flow of ideas.

Points:

16 (16.00%)

Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.

Points:

18 (18.00%)

Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. May have a few problems with clarity. Conclusion is logical.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.

APA 7th Ed FormatPoints:

(0.00%)

1 or more errors in APA format.

Points:

(0.00%)

Points:

(8.00%)

Length of assignment does not meet requirements.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Student is consistent in correct use of APA formatting. Formatting is free from errors. Student follows assignment instructions, including length of assignment.

Mechanics: Grammar, Punctuation & SpellingPoints:

(7.00%)

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language uses jargon or conversational tone.

Points:

(8.00%)

Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.

Points:

(9.00%)

Student demonstrates consistent rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling, with 1-3 errors.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Student demonstrates consistent correct us of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

Evidence/ReferencesPoints:

(7.00%)

Too few references. Evidence does not support ideas.

Points:

(8.00%)

Weak references or too few references that do not support ideas.

Points:

(9.00%)

Meets evidence requirements.

Points:

10 (10.00%)

Use of strong, current evidence and meets or exceeds number of references required. Exemplary evidence woven into paper to support ideas.

Investigate the practice of nursing professionals on the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors.

SUMMARY

Introduction

Providing safe, effective, timely and individualized care is a major challenge in health care. Currently, the main errors in health care are related to medication errors. These errors can cause damage, especially in pediatrics, due to the immaturity of the organs and the variation in weight and body surface. In this way, the importance of nursing in this scenario for the guarantee of safe care is perceived.

Objective

Investigate the practice of nursing professionals on the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors.

Method

Descriptive, quantitative study conducted with 147 nursing professionals in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. For data collection, a questionnaire elaborated and based on the recommendations of the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular catheter-related infections related to the practice of medication administration was used and then descriptive analysis of the data was performed.

Results

The professionals pointed out weaknesses of the practice such as double checking of medications, administration of medications prepared by the partner, delays and lack of verification of prescriptions. The most common errors resulted from erroneous dosages and environmental factors were presented as critical points.

Conclusion

The findings interfere with the consolidation of safety practices in medication administration in pediatrics and neonatology, suggesting the need for equipment qualification and continuous monitoring of the work process.

Palavras-key: Medication errors; Security; Nursing

INTRODUCTION

Currently, one of the biggest challenges of health services is to provide safe, effective, timely and individualized care since, due to technological and scientific advances and the inclusion of increasingly complex techniques, the risks to patient safety have been enhanced. 1

The report To Err is Human Building a Safer Health System Institute of Medicine of the United States of America (USA), published in 2000, exposed epidemiological studies in which it was estimated that between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths were recorded in the country per year due to errors in medical care, cases of which 30% were related to medication errors. 2 In Brazil, the National System of Toxic-Pharmacological Information (Sintox) reveals that drugs are in first place among agents that cause poisoning in humans, and second among those that cause poisoning in general. 1 Also in Brazil, a major study conducted in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro demonstrated a 14.3% incidence of adverse events caused by drugs, 31.2% of which caused a serious health risk requiring life support. 3

A medication error is defined as an avoidable adverse event, temporary or permanent, that occurs at any stage of drug therapy and may or may not cause harm to the patient. The damage is determined to be an adverse event, which is considered an incident that results in harm to the patient’s health and affects recovery, extends the time and costs of hospitalization and leads to death. Medication errors can be classified as follows: error of prescription, distribution, by omission, by schedule, by the use of unauthorized drugs, of dose, presentation, preparation, administration, control or by the non-adherence of the patient or the family. 4

Estimates show that, among all hospitalized patients, approximately 3% develop an adverse event due to medication use. Although the frequency is similar between children and adults, the potential risk of harm is three times higher in paediatric and neonatal patients. 4.5 The increased risk in children is attributed to organ immaturity and their influence on drug metabolism, as well as variation in weight and body surface area. In association with this fact, we can add that many drugs used in pediatrics were designed for adults; Then, as a result of fractionation of doses, they can lead to errors in the preparation and administration process. 6.7

Several studies have confirmed that errors during drug administration can be avoided, which shows the important participation of the nursing team in the system to promote patient safety. 6 This fact is even more striking in terms of pediatric care, since a systematic review of medication errors in children has shown that the medication administration process exhibited a higher frequency of errors, among other findings, with a rate of 72% to 75% and, consequently, it is imperative that all institutions and health teams promote changes in organizational culture that allow analysis with a restructuring of processes and the creation of security strategies in order to reduce, to an acceptable minimum, the unnecessary risks and harms associated with care 8. In pediatric and neonatal intensive care units, the number of errors is 22 to 59 errors per thousand doses and approximately 2.5% of these children suffer drug-related adverse events. 4

In this context, the role of the nursing team stands out because, in addition to exercising a leadership role in the administration and control of pharmacological therapy, the complexity of pediatrics requires greater depth of knowledge and the commitment of the professional to carry out the process. However, despite the law of professional practices that proclaims that nurses must perform the most complex practices, in daily practice it has been observed that nurses, technicians and nurse assistants have similar attributions in pharmacological therapy. 5

The absence of quality in this process, with the consequent problems and adverse events, can be avoided with proactive and preventive interventions of hospital administration. Among these interventions, it is worth mentioning the nursing team in relation to knowledge about the drug administration process as an important factor in preventing medication errors, with a view to improving patient safety. 4.7

The first step to preventing errors that affect health is to admit that it is possible and, from this, that professionals understand the types of adverse events, their causes, consequences and factors that contribute to these adverse events. The reporting and recording of adverse events serve as elements for critical analysis and decision-making, processes that aim to eliminate, avoid and reduce these circumstances in daily medical care. 9

To support and improve this practice, it is necessary to know how the nursing team works in drug administration in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, as well as the circumstances in which errors occur. This research can offer subsidies to professionals to allow an extended analysis of the practice and the problems that permeate this process and, consequently, favor the design of actions that improve the quality of care and safety for all involved.

Therefore, this study aims to investigate the practice of nursing professionals in the medication administration process, as well as the circumstances that lead to errors in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

METHOD

This is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, conducted with the nursing team of the neonatal and pediatric Intensive Care Units of an important hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.

Data were collected between August and November 2017, in morning, afternoon and evening shifts, on random days and contemplating six shifts per week. The study included all nurses, technicians and nurse assistants working in the respective units, so a sample of 147 professionals was reached. The following exclusion criteria were considered: professionals who were on vacation and on medical or maternity leave during the data collection period. A questionnaire was developed based on the recommendations of the Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Related to Intravascular Catheters 10 and was raised to the pre-trial phase with three specialist nurses, who indicated different suggestions for adjusting the instrument.

The instrument was divided into two parts: Part I was related to the characterization of the sociodemographic profile, where variables such as sex, age, time of exercise in the sector and profession, postgraduate training for nurses, working day and work shift, type of employment contract and participation in courses and conferences on the medication administration process were addressed. Part II included 14 questions that considered how often actions were initiated during the drug delivery process. Four alternatives were included for each action: always, sometimes, rarely or never; The participant had to indicate the correct option. In relation to the circumstance of the errors, 5 questions with various answers were included. These include questions about the types of errors, the circumstances that led to the errors, doubts in the medication process, actions related to the errors, and who to turn to in the event of an error.

The data were written without a spreadsheet in the Microsoft Excel 2010 program, with double typing. They were analyzed in the software StatisticalPackage for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19, using descriptive statistics with absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and measures of central trends (median) and dispersion for numerical variables.

The study respected the recommendations regarding privacy and confidentiality of Resolution No. 466, dated October 12, 2012, National Council for Scientific Research with Human Beings, and was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais and by the institution specialized in the field of study with the written opinion number 1,363,357 and CAAE number: 47994215.9.0000.5129. All research volunteers were pre-guided to the objectives and, after agreeing on them, participants signed the Free and Informed Consent Term (FICT) form on two counterparts.

RESULTS

The sample of this study was composed predominantly of nursing technicians between 25 and 68 years of age (median of 39 years), mostly women, with between 1 and 40 years of training (median of 12), who worked mainly in the Neonatal ICU, with a work regime of 12 hours per day/during the day and with a single and legally governed employment relationship.

Of the 24 nurses, two (8.3%) have a Master’s degree and 21 (87.5%) have a specialization. Among the professionals with specialization, 12 (57.1%) are related to pediatrics and neonatology, and nine (42.85%) to other areas. Table 1 shows the profiles of the professionals.

Table 1. Professional profile corresponding to the nursing team of neonatal and pediatric ICUs (N = 147). Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

Of the professionals who participated in the research, 51 (34.7%) indicated that they had participated in courses or conferences on the drug administration process between October 2016 and October 2017, while 94 (63.9%) stated that they had not done so during this period.

When asked if the nursing team had already made any mistakes in the medication preparation and administration process, 69 (46.9%) of the professionals answered yes, while 71 (48.3%) said no. Table 2 shows the descriptive analyses corresponding to the quantitative variables related to errors in drug preparation and administration.

Table 2. Frequency in relation to doubts and circumstances of errors when preparing and administering drugs. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

In relation to the conduct of professionals, when there was a delay in the administration schedule, 119 (81.0%) professionals said they administered the medication late, while 2 (1.4%) said they missed the schedule and 3 (2.0%) that they advanced the next administration. In addition, upon detecting an error in the medical prescription, 96 (65.3%) responded that they notified the nurse or the nursing coordination area, 90 (61.2%) notified the physician, and 1 (0.7%) participant stated that they tried to resolve it on their own. Table 3 shows the analyses related to the practice of professionals during the preparation and administration of drugs.

Table 3. Frequency of actions performed by professionals in the process of drug preparation and administration. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2017.

Table  Description automatically generated

DISCUSSION

The preparation and administration of drugs is a complex process in which nursing professionals have the important function of being the last barrier to avoid possible drug-related damages in the patient. Consequently, this study aimed to clarify that, through the analysis of the practice and circumstances of the errors, it is possible to propose more effective strategies to promote a culture of safety for the patient, by providing a more qualified and effective care.

Due to the unique nature and complexity of neonatology and pediatrics-oriented therapy, it is extremely important to deepen scientific knowledge and frequent training in such topics. 5 In opposition to this recommendation, this study noted that 63.9% of the study subjects indicated that they did not participate in courses or conferences on drug preparation and administration in the last year and that most have doubts regarding the action of the drugs, doubts that they resolve with their colleagues and not with the consulting nurse. Consequently, it is suggested that, to provide safe and quality care, it is necessary that work processes be reviewed based on scientific evidence and that professionals are trained and properly qualified, both leaders and those who carry out their orders. Educational strategies, mediated by focus groups or educational websites and didactic simulation games, have proven to be important interventions to reduce drug-related incident rates. 11.12

The main medication error mentioned by the professionals who participated in the study was that related to doses, which corroborates a study conducted in the United States with 120 patients in which it was shown that half of them were exposed to medication errors, and that most of the errors were linked to the dose. It should be noted that the main factor contributing to dose error in this study is the complexity and specificity of drug therapy in neonatology and pediatrics. 9,13 In the medical literature, there is evidence of a high prevalence of errors in medical prescription, more prevalent in drugs that want weight-based dosing and, therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific prescription instrument for pediatrics and neonatology, in addition to influencing the agreement of the measures taken when errors have been detected. 14

In relation to the reasons that contribute to medication error, environmental factors, such as poor lighting and inadequate physical conditions, constitute the highest percentage of the sample, followed by communication problems, which is corroborated by other studies. 15,16 It is verified that medication errors are due to the lack of preparation and knowledge of professionals, to the overload and stress generated in the work environment and to communication problems between the multidisciplinary team. It is also emphasized that it is common to suspend the administration of drugs and that the doctor who stopped it did not inform the nursing team. 15 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluated reports of fatal drug errors and found that 16% of the causes of such errors were attributed to communication problems. Consequently, prescribing is an important link in written communication between health professionals, and is seen as the beginning of a series of events within the medication process, which will lead to the safe administration of a dose to the patient. 17

Effective communication is another important factor in promoting patient safety in drug delivery, present in all interpersonal relationships, and is directly linked as a cause or contributing factor to most incidents. Adequate communication between professionals and patients and/or caregivers in relation to drug administration provided relevant and effective results, thus avoiding the occurrence of new incidents. 18

In relation to the incidence of errors, it is important to note that, from the recognition of an error, it is necessary to analyze the entire process and the components of the medication system, which can contribute or act as a barrier to overcome the error. These errors can be attributed to professionals, system failures, the institution or even the presentation of drugs. This analysis is indispensable to understand all the factors involved in the medication process, without attributing the failures to the incompetence or irresponsibility of employees. (1t)

In relation to the behavior of the professional in the face of error, most of the interviewees indicated that they notified the nursing coordination area, a fact that diverges from other studies. In a survey conducted in South Florida, it was found that 57.9% would not report an error if they thought it was not dangerous and 25% would not report it for fear of the consequences. The perception of the nursing staff regarding medication errors is that only 45.6% are reported; The rest is omitted for fear of reaction from leaders and colleagues. 19 The treatment given to error notifications with emphasis on staff performance contributes to the non-reporting of all errors, since professionals are afraid to respond to legal and administrative processes, to be labeled as negligent, to lose the trust of the administrator and his teams. It is a worrying reality that must be reversed because not reporting all errors prevents analyzing them and developing possible measures that minimize their frequency and guarantee patient safety.

Studies that problematize the cultural change in the approach to incidents related to patient safety have shown that an intervention specifically focused on this issue for professionals significantly reduces medication errors. In addition, political change in institutions is needed. 18

One of the main problems identified by the participants of this research was the interruption during the preparation of the drugs, which is included in the research as a critical point that leaves professionals more vulnerable to making a mistake, because they are exposed to distractions. In a study conducted with pediatric nurses, it was shown that the result was negative in 88.9% of the observed interruptions. Consequently, one study suggests that it is necessary to create restricted areas to prepare drugs, and thus avoid interference. 20

Double-checking is an effective method of eliminating errors in drug delivery. 15,16 In this study, the nursing team reported that this practice is scarce or practically nonexistent. In addition, there were cases where the drugs were administered by another person and cases where the drugs were not checked against the prescription before administration, which runs counter to good practice recommendations related to drug administration. 10

In this study, professionals reported that they follow some of the recommended actions in the safe drug delivery process. However, it should be considered that all practices involving patient safety in the health care process, and not just some, must be adhered to. Ensuring that good practices are adhered to prevents barriers from collapsing to prevent injuries. 10.16

The results presented are directly related to institutional specificities, a fact that limits generalization. Therefore, the relevance of studies with representative samples is highlighted, with the same theme as that of this study, resulting from the scarcity of studies with such design and focus in pediatrics and neonatology.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that the practice of drug preparation and administration has significant weaknesses that can jeopardize pediatric patient safety. Consequently, it is pointed out that it is necessary for the team to reflect on the findings so that behavioral changes and safety strategies can occur in order to avoid errors and, consequently, improve patient safety.

In view of the above, the relevance of such results is notorious. In this perspective, continuous team training with emphasis on the specifics of pediatrics and neonatology and the control and evaluation of process indicators are important strategies to avoid errors and adverse events. It is believed that, through these actions, the development and implementation of the safety culture is made possible.

 

image2.png

image3.png

image1.png

Test Bank Lewis s Medical Surgical Nursing 11 Edition Chapter 1 to 68 Questions and Answers!Rated A+ Answers

Test Bank Lewis s Medical Surgical Nursing 11 Edition Chapter 1 to 68 Questions and Answers!Rated A+ Answers

Table of Contents

Chapter 01: Professional Nursing

Chapter 02: Health Equity and Culturally Competent Care

Chapter 03: Health History and Physical Examination

Chapter 04: Patient and Caregiver Teaching

Chapter 05: Chronic Illness and Older Adults

Chapter 06: Stress Management

Chapter 07: Sleep and Sleep Disorders

Chapter 08: Pain

Chapter 09: Palliative and End of Life Care

Chapter 10: Substance Use Disorders

Chapter 11: Inflammation and Healing

Chapter 12: Genetics

Chapter 13: Immune Responses and Transplantation

Chapter 14: Infection

Chapter 15: Cancer

Chapter 16: Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Imbalances

Chapter 17: Preoperative Care

Chapter 18: Intraoperative Care

Chapter 19: Postoperative Care

Chapter 20: Assessment and Management: Visual Problems

Chapter 21: Assessment and Management: Auditory Problems

Chapter 22: Assessment: Integumentary System

Chapter 23: Integumentary Problems

Chapter 24: Burns

Chapter 25: Assessment: Respiratory System

Chapter 26: Upper Respiratory Problems

Chapter 27: Lower Respiratory Problems

Chapter 28: Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases

Chapter 29: Assessment: Hematologic System

Chapter 30: Hematologic Problems

Chapter 31: Assessment: Cardiovascular System

Chapter 32: Hypertension

Chapter 33: Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chapter 34: Heart Failure

Chapter 35: Dysrhythmias

Chapter 36: Inflammatory and Structural Heart Disorders

Chapter 37: Vascular Disorders

Chapter 38: Assessment: Gastrointestinal System

Chapter 39: Nutritional Problems

Chapter 40: Obesity

Chapter 41: Upper Gastrointestinal Problems

Chapter 42: Lower Gastrointestinal Problems

Chapter 43: Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas Problems

Chapter 44: Assessment: Urinary System

Chapter 45: Renal and Urologic Problems

Chapter 46: Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease

Chapter 47: Assessment: Endocrine System

Chapter 48: Diabetes Mellitus

Chapter 49: Endocrine Problems

Chapter 50: Assessment: Reproductive System

Chapter 51: Breast Disorders

Chapter 52: Sexually Transmitted Infections

Chapter 53: Female Reproductive Problems

Chapter 54: Male Reproductive Problems

Chapter 55: Assessment: Nervous System

Chapter 56: Acute Intracranial Problems

Chapter 57: Stroke

Chapter 58: Chronic Neurologic Problems

Chapter 59: Dementia and Delirium

Chapter 60: Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Problems

Chapter 61: Assessment: Musculoskeletal System

Chapter 62: Musculoskeletal Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery

Chapter 63: Musculoskeletal Problems

Chapter 64: Arthritis and Connective Tissue Diseases

Chapter 65: Critical Care

Chapter 66: Shock, Sepsis, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Chapter 67: Acute Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Chapter 68: Emergency and Disaster Nursing

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, before you can recommend potential pharmacotherapeutics to address a patient’s condition or disorder,

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, before you can recommend potential pharmacotherapeutics to address a patient’s condition or disorder, you must understand the basic function and structure of the neuron and central nervous system. For this Assignment, you will review and apply your understanding of neuroanatomy by addressing a set of short answer prompts. To Prepare: Review the Learning Resources for this week in preparation to complete this Assignment. Reflect on the basic function and structure of the neuron in relation to the central nervous system. Reflect on the inter-connectedness between neurons and the central nervous system, including the pathway and distribution of electrical impulses. Reflect on how neurons communicate with each other and review the concept of neuroplasticity. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Science Photo Libra To complete: Address the following Short Answer prompts for your Assignment. Be sure to include references to the Learning Resources for this week. In 4 or 5 sentences, describe the anatomy of the basic unit of the nervous system, the neuron. Include each part of the neuron and a general overview of electrical impulse conduction, the pathway it travels, and the net result at the termination of the impulse. Be specific and provide examples. Answer the following (listing is acceptable for these questions): What are the major components that make up the subcortical structures? Which component plays a role in learning, memory, and addiction? What are the two key neurotransmitters located in the nigra striatal region of the brain that play a major role in motor control? In 3 or 4 sentences, explain how glia cells function in the central nervous system. Be specific and provide examples.

The client is an 8-year-old African American male who arrives at the ER with his mother. He is exhibiting sig ns of depression.

The client is an 8-year-old African American male who arrives at the ER with his mother. He is exhibiting sig ns of depression. Client complained of feeling “sad” Mother reports that teacher said child is withdrawn from peers in class Mother notes decreased appetite and occasional periods of irritation Client reached all developmental landmarks at appropriate ages Physical exam unremarkable Laboratory studies WNL Child referred to psychiatry for evaluation MENTAL STATUS EXAM Alert & oriented X 3, speech clear, coherent, goal directed, spontaneous. Self-reported mood is “sad”. Affect somewhat blunted, but child smiled appropriately at various points throughout the clinical interview. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. Judgment and insight appear to be age-appropriate. He is not endorsing active suicidal ideation, but does admit that he often thinks about himself being dead and what it would be like to be dead. You administer the Children’s Depression Rating Scale, obtaining a score of 30 (indicating significant depression) Decision Point One Begin Zoloft 25 mg orally dailyBegin Zoloft 25 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks No change in depressive symptoms at all Decision Point Two Increase dose to 50 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Client returns to clinic in four weeks Depressive symptoms decrease by 50%. Cleint tolerating well Decision Point Three Maintain current DOSE Guidance to Student At this point, sufficient symptom reduction has been achieved. This is considered a “response” to therapy. Can continue with current dose for additional 4 week to see if any further reductions in depressive symptoms are noted. An increase in dose may be warranted since this is not “full” remission- Discuss pros/cons of increasing drug dose with client at this time and empower the client to be part of the decision. There is no indication that the drug therapy should be changed to an SNRI at this point as the client is clearly responding to this therapy. When pediatric patients present with mood disorders, the process of assessing, diagnosing, and treating them can be quite complex. Children not only present with different signs and symptoms than adult patients with the same disorders, they also metabolize medications much differently. Yet, there may be times when the same psychopharmacologic treatments may be used in both pediatric and adult cases with major depressive disorders. As a result, psychiatric nurse practitioners must exercise caution when prescribing psychotropic medications to these patients. For this Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat pediatric patients presenting with mood disorders. To prepare for this Assignment: Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week. Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of pediatric patients requiring antidepressant therapy. The Assignment: 5 pages Examine Case Study: An African American Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature. Introduction to the case (1 page) Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. Decision #1 (1 page) Which decision did you select? Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. Decision #2 (1 page) Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. Decision #3 (1 page) Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision?

Assessment 4 Instructions: Stakeholder Presentation

Assessment 4 Instructions: Stakeholder Presentation

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

· PRINT

· For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter.

You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Demonstration of Proficiency

· Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

1. Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

<li”>Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

1. Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

. Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

2. Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

2. Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

. Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

3. Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

3. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

Professional Context

This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

Scenario

In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan  could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA.

When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.

Instructions

Please follow the Capella  Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX] . If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to  Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations .

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

. Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

. Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

. Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

. Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

. Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

. Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.

9. What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?

9. Why should the audience care about solving it?

. Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.

10. Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?

10. How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?

. Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.

11. What is the objective?

11. How likely is it to work?

11. What will the interdisciplinary team do?

. Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.

12. How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?

12. How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?

12. How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?

. Part 5: Evaluation.

13. What would a successful outcome of the project look like?

13. What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?

2. How could this be used to show the degree of success?

Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.

Additional Requirements

· Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.

· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.

· APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

Designing a Population Health Quality Improvement Initiative

Designing a Population Health Quality Improvement Initiative

Instructions:

Write a plan for a 2-year long population health improvement initiative aiming to improve adolescent’s mental health, using a population health framework and using quality improvement methods. You may choose the setting and scope of the initiative. Think innovatively, and be realistic.

Introduction to the problem

Adolescent Mental Health Issue

About 50% of all mental health problems in adults start by the age of 14; however, most of the cases are not detected nor treated. Violence, poverty and other forms of adversity increase the risk of developing mental health disorders among adolescents. Adolescent depression is found to be a leading cause of mental illness and disability; and suicide is, in fact, the second leading cause of death in adolescents. (1) One way to improve healthcare services to adolescents with mental health problems is to adopt QI methodologies and develop strategies to implement or disseminate interventions. Nonetheless, there is no strong evidence for the effectiveness this approach in the literature. (2) 

References:

1. WHO. Available from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-solutions

2. Forman-Hoffman VL, Middleton JC, McKeeman JL, Stambaugh LF, Christian RB, Gaynes BN, Kane HL, Kahwati LC, Lohr KN, Viswanathan M. Strategies to improve mental health care for children and adolescents.

 

Deliverables: 2 pages (Max 1000 words) and 1 table summarizing the QI methodologies adopted and the relevant population HI frameworks in the development of a workable plan to implement or disseminate interventions.

Key points to be considered:

1. Approaches to population health improvement;

2. The interaction between these approaches

3. Quality improvement methods

In this design, combine population health and quality improvement approaches. Apply the methods and principles of quality improvement to a population health issue utilizing the relevant HI framework.

I got an impression that my prof wanted us to integrate the Population HI frame works with the Quality improvement methodologies to form a workable plan delivering quality health service to the adolescents. Pick the salient features of the relevant frameworks (See lecture notes) and collaborate the frame works with the appropriate QI methods such as PDSA cycles, patient, public and community participation, process mapping etc.

The aim is to establish a multi-discipline team to address this population health issue. Describe the interactions between the adopted QI methodology and the relevant population HI frameworks. Comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their interactions and the predicted outcomes. Set up a timeline of 2 years in this plan and specify the milestones along the way to validate the implementation and dissemination of the interventions proposed.

Here is what I think the table looks like:

Summary of Population HI Frameworks & Quality Improvement Interactions

Population HI FrameworkQI MethodsInteractions
   
   
   

 

image1.png

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AMONG THE FEMALE POPULATION

For this Discussion, you will explore the assessment of Social Determinants of Health. You will develop interview questions and techniques that will facilitate a full assessment of your patients. You will explore available instruments to complete a full assessment of an individuals Social Determinants of Health.

 

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AMONG THE FEMALE POPULATION

To prepare:

  • How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?
  • How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?
  • What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?
  • Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.
  • Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.
  • Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess her health risks and begin building a health history.

Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient. Identify and discuss at least one online, national, or local resource available to your at-risk client.