Denver Developmental Screening Tool

Denver Developmental Screening Tool

Lab Assignment

Name:________________________________

Date:____________________________

Course:OTA 200/201: OT treatment planning & techniques for adolescents & pediatrics

Course objective(s):

UNIT ONE: Implementation and Utilization of Practice Skills

Objective:

1. Student will demonstrate assessment techniques (with guidance from an Occupational Therapist).

2. Student will demonstrate how to interact with a child utilizing implementation and utilization of practice skills and include therapeutic use of self and effective communication during an assessment.

3. Student will demonstrate understanding of the effects of heritable diseases, genetic conditions, disability, trauma, and injury to the physical and mental health and occupational performance of the individual.

4. Student will learn how to work with families utilizing the teaching-learning process during a treatment session.

5. Student will demonstrate communication skills with the Occupational Therapist and other professionals.

6. Student will identify when there is a need to refer to specialists. 7. Student will learn how to document outcomes in a SOAP note format.

Procedure:

1. Student will record a video of a child between 1 month and 5 years old. 2. Student will score the Denver II (based on recorded video) following directions provided

during classroom instruction using Denver II instruction guide and hands outs given to them.

3. Student will write a SOAP note on both treatment sessions.

Curriculum Threads addressed:

 Commitment to lifelong clinical advancement  Occupation centered practice  Role Acquisition

Evaluation: Denver II Assessment

Unsatisfactory 7 pts

Prep sheet reveals minimal effort without clear understanding of guiding developmental principles (Piaget/Erickson). Does not follow directions or information is not stated, inaccurate, or unclear. Anticipatory guidance does not reflect application of developmental evaluative findings and their significance to the child and family. Reflections do not support evidence of

Average 8 pts

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the developmental screening process. Assessment data is appropriate but lacking in critical developmental and assessment information necessary to provide an accurate developmental evaluation. Anticipatory guidance is minimal and reveals a basic understanding of the developmental process and its significance to the child and family. Reflections

Good 9 pts

Demonstrates attainment of the developmental screening process and clinical objectives for this assignment. Assessment data is appropriate and provides most elements necessary to provide an accurate developmental evaluation. Anticipatory guidance reveals a working understanding of the developmental process and its significance to the child and

Excellent 10 pts

Demonstrates attainment of the developmental screening process and clinical objectives for this assignment. Assessment data is thorough, appropriate and provides all elements necessary to provide an accurate developmental evaluation. Anticipatory guidance reveals a thorough understanding of the developmental process and its

growth related to this assignment or to growth in the role of the Occupational Therapy Assistant.

provide evidence of some growth in the role of a Occupational Therapy Assistant.

family. Reflections provide evidence of some growth in the role of the Occupational Therapy Assistant.

significance to the child and family. Reflections provide excellent evidence of growth in the role of the Occupational Therapy Assistant.

Completion of Denver Screening: ______/10

SOAP note:

/10

Unacceptable contribution. Requires remediation in note writing.

Additional clarification is required. Moderate corrections required

Minimal corrections required, however, able to follow

Accurately completed all sections of the SOAP note

Instructor Notes:________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________

Initial Intervention Quality Review Rubric 35% of grade

Criteria Excellent 5 Adequate 3 Poor 1 Interventions 80%(5/6

interventions) of session with purposeful and occupation-based interventions

50% of (3/6 interventions) included purposeful and occupation-based interventions

30% of intervention were preparatory activities inclusive of adjunctive and contrived methods

Evidence-based support

Interventions supported by 4 evidenced- based cited articles

Interventions supported by 3 evidence- based cited articles

Interventions supported by 2 evidence-based cited articles

Client Centered Interventions are client centered, appropriated for goals established by the OTR, and address client’s goals as stated in the evaluation

Interventions are appropriate for goals established by the OTR

Interventions are diagnosis and therapist centered

Each session addressed more than 3 goals

3 or more goals addressed in 90- minute session

2 or more goals addressed in 30- minute session

2 goals addressed in 60-minute session

1 goal addressed in 30-minute session

1 goal addressed In 60-minute session

1 goal addressed in 30-minute session

Presentation skills PPT components Response to Peer Feedback

1. What would you have done differently with this client?

______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________

2. Any additional suggestions for this student group?

______________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________

Second Intervention Rubric- to be completed when student group presents again.

Criteria Excellent Adequate Poor Rationale for improvement

25

Based on thorough review, utilized 100% of suggestions and backed rationale with research. (25 points)

Based on a review of suggestions with 50% of rationale backed by research. (15 points)

Improvement is based on peer review only. No research to back up rationale. (5points)

Interventions Use the same information from above. (5 points) (3 points) (1 point)

Does Evidence base support Client Centered Goals?

ACOTE Standards: ACOTE Standards for an Accredited Educational Program for the Occupational Therapy Assistant:

B.1.2., B.2.6. , B.4.22, B.5.19. , B.5.22. , B.5.25. , B.7.6, B.8.3.