Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B
AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018
Evaluation Criteria Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs Improvement No Credit
Content (18 points)
Complete and organized
submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions.
Submission is missing minor elements
and/or is not well- organized and/or
missed an assignment instructions.
Submission is missing minor elements
and/or is not well- organized and/or
missed an assignment instructions.
Submission is missing elements and/or is not well-organized
and/or did not adhere to assignment instructions.
Did not submit or submission
unacceptable.
18 13.5 9 4.5 0
Application (18 points)
High quality submissions that
clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials.
Thorough explanation of key
factors/reasons that make milk a key ingredient in the
value chain established by Nestle, and the
geographic region.
Good submissions with some
connections to course materials.
Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal
experience, materials and/or comments.
Moderate explanation of key
factors/reasons that make milk a key ingredient in the
value chain established by Nestle, and the
geographic region.
Good submissions with some
connections to course materials.
Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal
experience, materials and/or comments.
Adequate explanation of key factors/reasons that make milk a key
ingredient in the value chain established by
Nestle, and the geographic region..
Little to no evidence that course materials
are understood or incorporated into submissions. Poor explanation of key
factors/reasons that make milk a key
ingredient in the value chain established by
Nestle, and the geographic region.
Did not submit or submission
unacceptable.
18 13.5 9 4.5 0
AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018
Organization and Grammar (4 points)
Properly formatted submissions
demonstrating professional, college-
level tone, no spelling or grammar
errors and well- documented sources
(when applicable).
Submission may be lacking proper formatting or
professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar
errors or is not well- supported (when
applicable).
Submission may be lacking proper formatting or
professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar
errors or is not well- supported (when
applicable).
Submission may be lacking proper
formatting and/or professional tone
and/or may contain multiple
spelling/grammar errors and/or is not
well-supported (when applicable).
Did not submit or submission
unacceptable.
