Information Systems Review
4/16/23, 4:43 PM Current Events & Trend Reports#7: Information Systems Review
https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/assignments/14471769?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fiu.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3D… 1/4
Current Events & Trend Reports#7: Information Systems Review 4/16/2023
50 Possible Points IN PROGRESS Next Up: Submit Assignment
Unlimited Attempts Allowed 4/2/2023
Attempt 1 Add Comment
Details
Information Systems Review Review the attached Case Analysis & Trend Report #7-Information Systems Review document and complete the following:
1. Submit your analysis in a minimum one-page word document 2. Submit your revised system’s diagram as a PDF or a screen capture (pic file)
I303-Case Analysis & Trend Report #7-Information Systems Review.pdf (https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/files/150892491?wrap=1)
View Rubric
(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/modules/items/28791133)
Submit Assignment(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/m
4/16/23, 4:43 PM Current Events & Trend Reports#7: Information Systems Review
https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/assignments/14471769?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fiu.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3D… 2/4
Report + Diagram
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content view longer description / 15 pts
Development view longer description / 15 pts
Organization view longer description / 5 pts
15 to >12 pts Full Marks
Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in- depth analysis and evidence of original thought and support for the topic.
12 to >8 pts Above Average
Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence
8 to >4 pts Average
Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas.
4 to >0 pts Below Average
Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdevel oped and unoriginal.
0 pts No Marks
Content underdevel oped and unoriginal.
15 to >12 pts Full Marks
The main points well developed with high- quality support. Reveals a high degree of critical thinking.
12 to >8 pts Above Average
The main points well developed with quality supporting details. Critical thinking is weaved into points
8 to >4 pts Average
Main points are present with limited detail and developmen t. Some critical thinking is present.
4 to >0 pts Below Average
Main points lack detailed developmen t. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.
0 pts No Marks
No detailed developmen t. Ideas with little evidence of critical thinking.
5 to >3 pts Full Marks
The analysis shows a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.
3 to >0 pts Average
The analysis is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout the analysis.
0 pts No Marks
No logical organization present. Serious errors throughout, with no coherent unity.
(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/modules/items/28791133)
Submit Assignment(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/m
4/16/23, 4:43 PM Current Events & Trend Reports#7: Information Systems Review
https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/assignments/14471769?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fiu.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3D… 3/4
Choose a submission type
Report + Diagram
Criteria Ratings Pts
Grammar, Mechanics, Style/Format view longer description
/ 5 pts
Diagram view longer description / 10 pts
Total Points: 0
5 to >3 pts Full Marks
The analysis is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absence of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. Shows outstanding style going beyond usual college level; rhetorical devices and tone used effectively. Meets formatting requirements with evidence of attention to detail; all margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; the analysis is neat and correctly assembled with a professional look. Sources properly cited.
3 to >0 pts Average
Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress through the analysis. Some errors remain. Approaches college level usage of some variety in sentence patterns, diction, and rhetorical devices. Generally correct margins, spacing, and indentations; the analysis is neat but may have some assembly errors. Sources cited.
0 pts No Marks
Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create a distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent. Mostly in elementary form with little or no variety in sentence structure, diction, rhetorical devices, or emphasis. The neatness of the analysis needs attention, along with formatting.
10 to >0 pts Critique of diagram understanding
Understands and interprets information correctly and systematically.
0 pts No Marks
Diagram insufficient/or missing from the assignment.
Upload More
(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/modules/items/28791133)
Submit Assignment(https://iu.instructure.com/courses/2133368/m
